Monday, April 29, 2024
04:04 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Off Topic Section > Off Topic Lounge
why did pti lost case in judicial commission why did pti lost case in judicial commission

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #11  
Old Sunday, August 02, 2015
ADIL KHESHGI's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Doldrums
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 513
Thanked 816 Times in 550 Posts
ADIL KHESHGI will become famous soon enoughADIL KHESHGI will become famous soon enough
Default
Your post is either too much tricky or faulty😛


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts" (Winston Churchill)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old Tuesday, August 04, 2015
Muhammad Hammad Mangi's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: I am in your mind !
Posts: 116
Thanks: 16
Thanked 38 Times in 27 Posts
Muhammad Hammad Mangi is on a distinguished road
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mehria View Post
Why did pti lost case in judicial commission.
Hence the Solution For You Will be that :
Be a optimistic Bureaucrat and then Develop Our country on your own
But still no matter what u do You will Surely Face hard times in the way of Justice Yeah but if we have Unity then it will be an anecdotal Event in the History of the Nation
__________________
Sometimes the reason of the reason in your mind is the reason of your reasoning problem,,,
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old Tuesday, August 04, 2015
Sociologist PU's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Lahore
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 369
Thanked 564 Times in 377 Posts
Sociologist PU is a name known to allSociologist PU is a name known to allSociologist PU is a name known to allSociologist PU is a name known to allSociologist PU is a name known to allSociologist PU is a name known to all
Default
There was no rigging at all. In fact, Mr. Khan does not know the process of election and was instigated by some party leaders and ex-Generals to believe that he can come to power by raising hue and cry on this issue.

Thanks God the conspiracy failed and Mr. Khan lost all his charm that he had built up over the years.
__________________
/// Aur be ghum hain zamanay main muhabat kay siwa ///
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sociologist PU For This Useful Post:
ADIL KHESHGI (Tuesday, August 04, 2015), Irtika (Friday, August 07, 2015)
  #14  
Old Friday, August 07, 2015
Irtika's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Rural Sindh
Posts: 182
Thanks: 292
Thanked 129 Times in 77 Posts
Irtika will become famous soon enoughIrtika will become famous soon enough
Thumbs up
WE as a nation waste our time and precious resources on such irrelevant and unimportant think. I am happy that real face of mr clean has been exposed.

feeling excited he deserves more than it. I do not know why even so called educated young man are inspired by mr taliban.


And we have even weak but have democracy so I have every right to say whatever I think is right for my beloved country.
__________________
For me it is enough that I am different from others.
Last edited by incounternable; Friday, August 07, 2015 at 11:13 PM. Reason: chain posts merged
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Irtika For This Useful Post:
ADIL KHESHGI (Monday, August 24, 2015), Sociologist PU (Monday, August 24, 2015)
  #15  
Old Saturday, August 08, 2015
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Lahore
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Xafaryab is on a distinguished road
Default Here's what i think:
Let's assume for a fact that the rigging, the cheating did occur. If it did so how can i, as a average guy, would believe it? I would certainly demand evidence for that so if the evidence is true, well supported than i don't see why i should not be favoring the elections held back in 2013. If i don't get evidence from the claimer i would have to disagree with him/her/them. I personally think it's is very easy to not just say things but also make things happen thanks to photoshoping. Now i favor evidence on which i would mark my judgement so if there is evidence please do let me and the counsel regarding the rigging know and if not, carry on the claims, it is your basic right to say what you want, when you want, how you want and where you want.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old Saturday, August 08, 2015
Muhammad T S Awan's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: AppreciationDiligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Land of Uncia Uncia :)
Posts: 2,071
Thanks: 1,731
Thanked 2,264 Times in 1,100 Posts
Muhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant futureMuhammad T S Awan has a brilliant future
Default
AoA

PTI lost the case due to lack of evidence.
__________________
'Thee woh ik shakhs kay tasawar saay - abb woh ranayee khayal kahaan'
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Saturday, August 08, 2015
ADIL KHESHGI's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Doldrums
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 513
Thanked 816 Times in 550 Posts
ADIL KHESHGI will become famous soon enoughADIL KHESHGI will become famous soon enough
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by khanbrw View Post
[

They're complaining cause they're the losers. I'm not a supporter of PMLN but I'm trying to be truthful��


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pmln supporter always hide himself for saying i am not supporter of pmln. its my experince

[/QUOTE]

I'm A NATIONALIST bro! Always believed on PAKISTANI NATIONALISM and am a staunch follower of Quaid i Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. I will not support any wolf in a sheep's clothing, if that's NS, IK or whatever, I will not support anyone of them if they're not delivering to the grassroot level. Go on a visit to the less-privileged localities, you'd come to know how much Unpure life is in this State of Pures. Hell with all those who're deceiving the innocent lot of this fateful land.
Respect!
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts" (Winston Churchill)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ADIL KHESHGI For This Useful Post:
Irtika (Saturday, August 15, 2015)
  #18  
Old Sunday, August 09, 2015
Junior Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 17
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
amreen shahid is on a distinguished road
Default
pti lost the case because JC persons behaves as judges they didnt probe anything they just listen and gave the verdict but that was not their only responsibility they have to investigate on the basis of evidences provided by pti and other parties it was not a supreme court panel that was a comission and comission have to inquire about but unfortunately they didnt
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Wednesday, August 12, 2015
muntaha mughal's Avatar
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Lahore
Posts: 41
Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
muntaha mughal is on a distinguished road
Default
rigging was confirm not only imran khan but other party members agreed too.. in the parliament it was said there too by a membwr that rigging is confirm..
Rigging is not proved by PTI due to lack of evidences, however, JC, it supported PTI that it was its right to file the case! Imran khan already said that he and his party will accept the JC report. as i think that PML-N is in power as compared to other parties including PTI therefore it is not difficult for nawaz sharif to change the cards at any time.
__________________
"Mind needs books just like a sword needs whetstone"
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Wednesday, August 19, 2015
ADIL KHESHGI's Avatar
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Doldrums
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 513
Thanked 816 Times in 550 Posts
ADIL KHESHGI will become famous soon enoughADIL KHESHGI will become famous soon enough
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by amreen shahid View Post
pti lost the case because JC persons behaves as judges they didnt probe anything they just listen and gave the verdict but that was not their only responsibility they have to investigate on the basis of evidences provided by pti and other parties it was not a supreme court panel that was a comission and comission have to inquire about but unfortunately they didnt
The PTI couldn't furnish solid evidence, hearsays can't be counted as evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by muntaha mughal View Post
rigging was confirm not only imran khan but other party members agreed too.. in the parliament it was said there too by a membwr that rigging is confirm..
Rigging is not proved by PTI due to lack of evidences, however, JC, it supported PTI that it was its right to file the case! Imran khan already said that he and his party will accept the JC report. as i think that PML-N is in power as compared to other parties including PTI therefore it is not difficult for nawaz sharif to change the cards at any time.
PTI can be subjected to the same criticism in the Local Bodies' Elections in KPK.
Respect
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts" (Winston Churchill)
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Constitution of the United States Muhammad Adnan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 3 Saturday, February 01, 2020 02:25 AM
Syllabi for Consolidated Advertisement No.01/2014 Of FPSC 2014 Bablii Anti Narcotics Force (ANF) 3 Wednesday, February 26, 2014 03:25 PM
Police Ordinance 2002 rao adeel Police Service of Pakistan 4 Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:01 PM
18th amendment; Notes moss4u Current Affairs Notes 2 Tuesday, September 21, 2010 11:40 AM
Judicial Activism Soulreader43 International Relations 0 Saturday, February 13, 2010 07:10 PM

CSS Forum - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top

CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.