There was a question about John Gultang..
Martin Luther king movement? It was confusing.. Both non violence and ethnic rights were true..

Foreign exchange & inflation are the right answers

It was Junior Luther's Junior movement was about "youth enlightenment" I did something like that. Not sure whether it is correct or not!

Tough challenges reveal strengths and weaknesses- Outline.

Introduction

• Thesis statement
• Adversity as an opportunity;Hardship as a hope
• Challenges and problems

1. Pushes the limits of human being
2. Help them in evolving
3. Help them innovate and create

Weak doesn’t survive unless they transform.
Theory of Evolution- Darwin; Either threat vanishes or the one facing it.

Great Men theory- Thomas Carlyle.

Are Strength or Weakness innate characteristics? Or developed traits?

Lives of Individuals in the realm of adversity.

• Julius Caesar
• Nelson Mandela
• Hazrat Bilal in the deserts of Arabia
• In the wake of a great challenge, extraordinary men are separated from the ordinary men.
• Those who show timidity in the times of a Challenge.

Lives of Nations and their place in history, when faces some great Hardships.

• French Revolution
• American Revolution
• British democratization of State
• Present day conditions of failed states and African civil war trodden countries

Conclusion:
Calm seas never make skillful sailors; The greater the hardship the greater the triumph.

Impulse is the change in monentum which is
F.t=▲mv
(So right answer should be force.time)

True. Both were correct but I chose Ethnic rights as ethnicity was the very reason he opted policy of non violence.

- Shah Wali Ullah wrote book in Shia-Sunni division? Izalat Al Akhifa was right answer.

In World War II, approximately 65 million people were killed. This figure includes women, children, elderly citizens, civilians, prisoners, and soldiers. Theses people may have been your mother, father, sister, brother, daughter, son, neighbor, loved-one, or a completer stranger. You could have been one of these victims thoughtlessly slaughtered in the desire for control, power, and revenge. You could have been one of the victims barely mourned over and buried without care due to the massive amounts of dead people piling up all around. If you were not murdered, you could have been drastically affected by the aftershock and horror of war. Even though 65 million people were killed, this war was not difficult. It was a physical way of solving our political and emotional problems. World War II, along with all other wars, was a cowardly escape from the hardships of working together and rationally facing facts and coming up with solutions to the world’s problems.
Bombs and bullets seem to be used to solve any problem that faces us today. If you do not like the way another government controls their citizens or politics, the solution is to simply blow them into submission, and force them to accept your ways by sheer manpower. This to me appears to be an extremely ineffective way of reaching a solution. The purpose of war is to change some aspect of the world, or to impose one country’s will on another. By destroying or severely damaging a country through violence and warfare, the concept you wished to enforce will be rejected and despised. Even if the idea you were forcing upon the people was the greatest idea know to mankind, it would still be viewed in a negative light. This is so because, people have a tendency to think lesser of ideas that are not there own. Therefore the entire purpose of going to war in the first place is made useless and thousands of innocent people died for nothing.
Instead of resorting to violent tactics to impose your will on others, a more peaceful and diplomatic approach should be taken. In war, buildings are destroyed, land is ruined, people are killed, and tension between countries rises tremendously. When a country wins a war, they demand that the losing side meet their requests and follow their wishes. The losing country naturally feels some resentment toward the winning country and fulfills their requests grudgingly. Since there is bitterness between the two countries, future exchanging of ideas becomes obsolete and the only way to change anything is through war once again. This becomes a vicious cycle of violence and the need to physically dominate over everyone. If in the beginning the two countries had talked through their problems, a compromise could have been made and more agreements are possible for the future. Peace offers the chance to save land, lives, and relationships and allows for progress to be made again. War does not solve any permanent problems and only offers a future of more violence and no lasting results.
In the novel 1984, George Orwell wrote “War is Peace”. The meaning of this quote is that through war, the citizens of a country do not revolt, have rebellions, or small inner war-like squabbles. The country experiences a state of “peace” while at war, because the people are focused on protecting themselves and their loved ones from attacks by the enemies, and no longer have the energy for trivial uprisings. Also, much of the citizens’ energy is spent providing supplies for the army, so almost every available person is working at least one job and free time becomes minimal. The main premise of the quote “War is Peace” is that when people live in fear of attacks from an outside enemy, they do not fight with themselves, and create a sense of peace. I believe that this quote is sorely mistaken and that there is no peace found in war. Peace is defined as “a state of tranquility or serenity”. This means that to truly be at peace, the citizens must be without fear and have no outside stressed controlling their actions. Living in a permanent state of fear is not peace therefore proving the claim war is peace to be false.
War kills. War creates more problems than it solves. War induces fear and negatively affects everyone involved. Peace on the other hand saves lives, solves problems, and creates a sense of safety and happiness. War is cowardly and the easy route to choose. Peace takes courage and the mental capacity of someone more mature than an ignorant child. A wise man named Thomas Mann once said that “War is the cowardly escape from the problems of peace.” I wholeheartedly agree with this statement. The obvious answer it seems is to choose peace and to handle all our world’s problems with diplomacy and intelligence. So, talk it out before blowing it up.

My personal opinion is to stay away from grim topics such as war, unless you can paint a very bright picture. I'd rather attempt something that has light at the end of the tunnel at every single point ;D! Better mood of examiner, better the marks. /fingers-crossed.

__________________
D:

I have written essay on this topic without single heading..between I did not remember now as I have done it

__________________
Your Intelligence is my Common Sense

google sy copy paste an karo