I agree with Adil. To add to what he said, remember that the examiner and the paper-setter usually have the same background and hence they are expected to think alike. If your paper-setter says "Feminism is not REALLY a third world issue" (i.e. Feminism darasal teesri dunya ka masla hai he nahi), the examiner will also be of the same opinion and would expect you to prove it by your arguments. If you want to go against it, you will not only have to show excellent argumentation, but also have to change the already made up mind of the examiner. This is an uphill task. So why not just tell the examiner what he already believes in himself instead of going for an adventure that can put your attempt at stake?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk