One thing I haven't understood why did the court write this "Recruitment process shall continue and the result of the recruitments process would be subject to the outcome of this writ"

Doesn't the court realize that if the outcome of the writ is in favour of old employees or desolution of current posts than what was the point of "continuing the recruitment process" in the first place.
Also if the outcome of the writ is prolonged than what is the point of continuing the recruitment process and withholding the result and with result i mean issuing letters and not allowing people to join.

Either they should have completely stopped the recruitment process there and than (ta k baat yahan tak aati hi nai) or they could have allowed the complete recruitment process to take place separating the two things completely all together.

Nobody has gained any advantage by continuation of recruitment process if the joining was eventually to be held.

Sent from my LT700 using Tapatalk