I TOTALLY AGREE !! because then people who take native languages and score 95 or 180+ in these kind of subjects will be given no leverage in comparison to those who take more analytical and pervasive subjects like economics and literature and suffer the repercussions in terms of low score or failure regardless of the fact that they have scored brilliant in the compulsory pmmmmph I also think that the aggregate should be 40 % instead of 50 because the bulk fails in achieving that because of change in marking trends (i scored 598 myself IMAGINE my level of DISILLUSION ) so although they are bright students but they fail because of their subject selection i guess and of course the examiner's mood and expectation also come into play *Sigh*