Quote:
Originally Posted by acme
Here goes my attempt. Please, seniors check it and comment about it. Thanks
Socrates’ teachings unveil the dual and pathetic nature of his wisdom. His teachings, a perfect blend of divergent ideas, were the important feature of Sophisticism. But the Sophists have failed to follow his outlook in the true spirit. One solution to this vagueness, developed by the Sophists, could be in following the Aristophanes who discouraged the freedom of thought and encouraged authority-following unquestionably. (63 Words)
Title: Sophisticism – disfigure of Socrates’ teachings
Note: i have doubts about the word Sophisticism, i have used it as it is. Is it not Sophism ?
Regards,
Ali
|
Nice work, Acme. No it is right word.
--------------------
Lets Solve 2006 Precise.
Seem tough
It was not so in Greece, where philosophers professed less, and undertook more. Parmenides pondered nebulously over the mystery of knowledge; but the pre-Socratics kept their eyes with fair consistency upon the firm earth, and sought to ferret out its secrets by observation and experience, rather than to create it by exuding dialectic; there were not many introverts among the Greeks. Picture Democritus, the Laughing Philosopher; would he not be perilous company for the dessicated scholastics who have made the disputes about the reality of the external world take the place of medieval discourses on the number of angles that could sit on the point of a pin? Picture Thales, who met the challenge that philosophers were numskulls by “cornering the market” and making a fortune in a year. Picture Anaxagoras, who did the work of Darwin for the Greeks and turned Pericles form a wire-pulling politician into a thinker and a statesman, Picture old Socrates, unafraid of the sun or the stars, gaily corrupting young men and overturning governments; what would he have done to these bespectacled seedless philosophasters who now litter the court of the once great Queen? To Plato, as to these virile predecessors, epistemology was but the vestibule of philosophy, akin to the preliminaries of love; it was pleasant enough for a while, but it was far from the creative consummation that drew wisdom’s lover on. Here and there in the shorter dialogues, the Master dallied amorously with the problems of perception, thought, and knowledge; but in his more spacious moments he spread his vision over larger fields, built himself ideal states and brooded over the nature and destiny of man. And finally in Aristotle philosophy was honoured in all her boundless scope and majesty; all her mansions were explored and made beautiful with order; here every problem found a place and every science brought its toll to wisdom. These men knew that the function of philosophy was not to bury herself in the obscure retreats of epistemology, but to come forth bravely into every realm of inquiry, and gather up all knowledge for the coordination and illumination of human character and human life.
Regards
--------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by bunko
Lets Solve 2006 Precise.
Seem tough
It was not so in Greece, where philosophers professed less, and undertook more. Parmenides pondered nebulously over the mystery of knowledge; but the pre-Socratics kept their eyes with fair consistency upon the firm earth, and sought to ferret out its secrets by observation and experience, rather than to create it by exuding dialectic; there were not many introverts among the Greeks. Picture Democritus, the Laughing Philosopher; would he not be perilous company for the dessicated scholastics who have made the disputes about the reality of the external world take the place of medieval discourses on the number of angles that could sit on the point of a pin? Picture Thales, who met the challenge that philosophers were numskulls by “cornering the market” and making a fortune in a year. Picture Anaxagoras, who did the work of Darwin for the Greeks and turned Pericles form a wire-pulling politician into a thinker and a statesman, Picture old Socrates, unafraid of the sun or the stars, gaily corrupting young men and overturning governments; what would he have done to these bespectacled seedless philosophasters who now litter the court of the once great Queen? To Plato, as to these virile predecessors, epistemology was but the vestibule of philosophy, akin to the preliminaries of love; it was pleasant enough for a while, but it was far from the creative consummation that drew wisdom’s lover on. Here and there in the shorter dialogues, the Master dallied amorously with the problems of perception, thought, and knowledge; but in his more spacious moments he spread his vision over larger fields, built himself ideal states and brooded over the nature and destiny of man. And finally in Aristotle philosophy was honoured in all her boundless scope and majesty; all her mansions were explored and made beautiful with order; here every problem found a place and every science brought its toll to wisdom. These men knew that the function of philosophy was not to bury herself in the obscure retreats of epistemology, but to come forth bravely into every realm of inquiry, and gather up all knowledge for the coordination and illumination of human character and human life.
Regards
|
Here goes my Attempt: Please Comment
Philosophy - As a tool for teaching
Greek Philosophers scanty works, examine in ample. Pre-socrates tried to revealed the truth of earth with wisdom and consciousness rather bluffing it. Philosophers like Democritus, Thales, Anaxagoras, Socrates and Plato puts their efforts in same direction to broaden the horizon of thinking and let their successors to think out of the box for the welfare of mankind. They gave lesson to their successors to learn from them, that standing for the truth and benefit of the mankind and human character; would give them honor and prestige in every kingdom.
Regards,
Note:
Please Comment Must hey !