I appriciate fawad. He has straight forwerdly put forwerd his honest views regarding this issue. Institutuions are not build up by personalities. Instead they are evolved and deneloped by traditions and customs they hold. Civil bureaucreacy mean civil exacutive body. It should not be intermingle or share with any other exacutine body. Army is no doubt our pride but its duty is to defend borders not to run the civil exacutive institutions. If some one is thinking to defend it on the grounds of middle class representation and 12 years education. It is totaly false. Democratic state mean the majority rule for the good of all. Rule of law is prerequisit for this sacred cause. If you are arguaing that majority of the middle class is only in army. Donot forget the labour and trade unions. They are pure representatives of middle class. Why dont you suggest them to incorporate in cicil bureaucreacy amd millitary both, without any exam. And if a millitary general holded 3 designations at the same time, it is not because the illigibility of millitry to rule but because of the Illiteracy of our masses. Lastly if any 1 still has a utopian wish to incorporate army officer in civil exacutive donot forget the lessons of Fall of Dhaka. All bureaucracy were there was headed by our brave Army. But it only terrorize Bengalis bureaucracy and owed to the riots of East Pakistan Riffles and East Pakistan police. I think now it should be clear that fawad rose a very importent and critical question. Either we should accept a Quaid's Modern Democratic Pakistan, Or a Facist Pakistan of Armed force leaders. Whether we wish to develop our institutions or want to see them destroying under the heavy slogens of So called NATIONALISM.
Long Live Pakistan.
Hope for a new dawn of democracy. equality and rule of law.