Quote:
Originally Posted by shallowwater
@ Floydian.
I think you better think before casting aspersions on me. America funneled billions of dollars into Pakistan during Musharraf rule, where did they all went? If he was patriotic he would not have overthrown a democratically elected government in 1999. If he was democratic he would not have even thought about putting the whole supreme court under house arrest. If he was patriotic then he would not have got himself re.elected in uniform. If he was patriotic he would not have sold people of Pakistan like his property. If he was patriotic then he would not have resigned like a coward on 18 August, 2008. If he was patriotic he would have faced the parliament and faced the courts in Pakistan.
Bhutto was patriotic so he refused to salute the Zia dictatorship and instead kissed the gallows.
|
First, let me admit that I enjoy heated but useful discussions with my friends on this forum. I respect other members and their opinions.
Shallow, now you are just wandering like a nomad. First you raised the issue of Great General's Chak Shahzad residency and accused him of acquiring it illegally. Failing to prove such bogus allegation you then jumped to one hundred one (101) other issues. If you are a supporter or worker of Zardari's PPP (which seems quite obvious) then we really cannot have an analytical, critical and unbiased discussion.
Secondly, Bhutto is responsible for East Pakistan debacle. He never kissed the gallows rather he shivered, cried, screamed and experienced unstoppable convulsions while being escorted to the gallows. He was just a charismatic leader and an outstanding orator. And Zia was the worst thing happened to Army and this country. Bhutto is thousand times preferable over Zia but not over Musharraf. Nothing less and nothing more...
cheers,
floydian