Originally Posted by aksk

Ur argument is based on fallacious premise. Just consider, b it any corporate practice or exam, competition promotes effieciency and raises standards..erecting entry barriers benefits selected few, limits competition, violates universal principle of equal opportunity and results in steep fall in standards.
I invite u2 kindly contemplate and note da self contradictory argument presented by u in ur earlier post which says "I agree that bachelors/masters degree is not a measure of ones intellect, dedication and sincerity however it is also true that a candidate possessing a masters degree would have more knowledge and experience and would generally fare better than a candidate possessing bachelors degree."
Plus no1 is arguing against da expected better performance of an MA but tell me does this in any way justify denial of right2 appear in exam4 da BA.
As4 ur insistence dat the MA would have accumulated more knowledge, nothing0 can judge dis better dan da CSS written portion. As4 da possibility of an MA having acquired more experience or supposedly more maturity than da BA graduate, da FPSC panel of seasoned officials can gauge dat better.
CSS syllabus explicitly says that the level shall b of Bachelors degree. There4 i feel dat da MAs r already overqualified or perhaps dey were a bit slow in opting4 civil service or mayb insecure and tried2 have alternative career path in the fear of anticipated unpleasant outcome.