Quote:
Originally Posted by Sultan Rahi
I don't agree. Scoring high marks by cramming for 1 or 2 years is not guarantee to be MERITORIOUS. Your personality matters a lot. Generals don't reach this position in a single day, they are seasoned and well groomed personalities. Don't be biased that all Generals are same. B+.
|
The Generals used this clause in 2007 ruthlessly...(Agreed with Candlenight)
A candidate from Sindh was declared suitable for PSP.Later he was admitted in a hospital for having psychological problems.GREAT SUITABILITY
.He has been reallocated in any other group.
The psychologists put pen pic of the candidate before the interview panel.If the candidate is fit for any group he is given such marks as to enable him to fall in that very group.His merit postion is raised. But a candidat who has lowest merit and is allocated in higher groups is unjust,whatsoever.
A candidate scoring 605 and getting DMG or PSP is an insult of the merit. If group allocations are to be made according to the suitability then the FPSC should not announce the merit list of the candidates rather the successful candidates should be allocated in the suitable groups.
I disfavour the unjust execution of suitability clause against the merit of the candidate.