Quote:
Originally Posted by mossavir
My friend scored 68 in journalism. He copied my notes, and read one book and that is journalism for all by mehdi hasan. He's a mediocre student, hates to explain things, writes short answers and he nailed 13 mcq's in journalism paper. he do not have any idea from where he got 68 marks in journalism.
|
Dear musavir,
Ur friend opted the strategy that Fpsc examiners followed this time
that is
giving solid marks to the people who had written to-the-point stuff.
who did not give theories, hypothesis and flowery explainations.
This is the case with me
i had studied only relevant material for journalism u can say only 5 topics and nailed 16 correct objectives then
i scored 59 in the subject.
can u believe that?
On the other hand,
i had studied four books for the
forestry coz it waz subject quite novel to me and i prepared notes by myself for all the topics mentioned in the syllabus. i left not a single topic unread.I did 14 mcq's correct and attempted all the four papers
in hefty details with charts as well
at the end of the day, i scored a
BIG 33 .
so, crux ov the matter is that ,
this time details and explainations were considered OVER EFFECIENCY .
better luck next time.
