Originally Posted by Roshan wadhwani

Comparison Between The Nehru Report And The Fourteen Points Of Quaid


1:-FORM OF GOVT


Quaid’s Fourteen Points

i) There should be a federal form of government in India.

Nehru Report
i) There should be a unitary form of government in India.


2:-PROVINCIAL AUTONOMY


Quaid’s Fourteen Points

ii) There should be full provincial autonomy in India.

Nehru Report

ii) There should be a dominion status in India.

3:- SEPERATE ELECTORATE


Quaid’s Fourteen Points

iii) Quaid’s 14 points gave a concept of separate electorate for all communities of India.

Nehru Report

iii) Nehru Report gave a concept of joint electorate for all communities in India.

4:-SEPERATION OF SINDH


Quaid’s Fourteen Points

iv) Sindh should be separated from Bombay.

Nehru Report

iv) Sindh should be separated from Bombay.


5:-LINGUISTIC ISSUE

Quaid’s Fourteen Points

v) The issue of language was not discussed language in 14 points.

Nehru Report

v) Hindi should be made an official

6:-IMPARTIALITY

Quaid’s Fourteen Points

vi) Quaid’s points were the solution of the whole Indian communities.

Nehru Report

vi) Nehru Report was based on narrow mindedness and protected only Hindu interests.

7:-MUSLIM REPRESENTAION IN CENTRAL LEGISLATURE

Quaid’s Fourteen Points

vii) Central Legislature should not make any legislation without the prior permission of any other unit of federation.

Nehru Report

vii) There was no such thing in the Nehru Report. Congress considered itself the only representating body of the whole India. It did not want division of India and favoured joint electorate in place of a separate electorate.

[B][U]8:-MINORITY CULTURE SAFEGUARDE
Quaid’s Fourteen Points

viii) Quaid’s 14 points suggested the establishment of a state in which Muslim culture, civilization and religion should be protected.

Nehru Report

viii) While Nehru report wanted to occupy the whole India.