Quote:
Originally Posted by Anum86anu
Salam,
In answering the question, I wrote introduction and conclusion of 2 questions with my own interpretations like in WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR A WIFE TO DISSOLVE MARRIAGE ACCORDING TO THE 1939 ACT?
I gave INTRODUCTION ACCORDING TO the rights of Woman in Islam then in Body I wrote The Grounds then I gave conclusion with my own words.
Now plz tell tell me whether It is a blunder to write Introduction and conclusion in Muslim Law & Jurisprudence or not? I did it becoz as to me the answers were too short. By doing it I also gave a different HEADING for different Ground.
DiD I do any Mistake? Isn't it allowed to write by ur own in Law
papers?
|
[QUOTE=Anum86anu;349278]
Salam,
In answering the question, I wrote introduction and conclusion of 2 questions with my own interpretations like in WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR A WIFE TO DISSOLVE MARRIAGE ACCORDING TO THE 1939 ACT?
I gave INTRODUCTION ACCORDING TO the rights of Woman in Islam then in Body I wrote The Grounds then I gave conclusion with my own words.
Now plz tell tell me whether It is a blunder to write Introduction and conclusion in Muslim Law & Jurisprudence or not? I did it becoz as to me the answers were too short. By doing it I also gave a different
HEADING for different Ground.
Dear me
U just gave two three headings
I used to gv headings in all papers
My question wd have the following heading for this question
Intro
Interpretation of term DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
explanatory note
Historical aspect
Valid Marriage- basuc condition for Dissolution of marriage
Qyranic and hadith ref
Modes of dissolution of marriages
Khula- one of the modes of dissolution
Right of khula under DMMA 1939
grounds explanation( sub headings for all grounds)
Basis of Khula in Islam
Comparative study of right of Khula to muslim woman vs ither religions
Drawbaks in DMMA 1939
conclusion
Hope u get the idea