View Single Post
  #20  
Old Thursday, December 08, 2011
andleeb Akhter andleeb Akhter is offline
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2012- Roll No 13813
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Punjab
Posts: 202
Thanks: 335
Thanked 368 Times in 136 Posts
andleeb Akhter has a spectacular aura aboutandleeb Akhter has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by azeegum View Post
The NATO attack actually took place as the result of a fall-out of the conflict going on between the White House and the Pentagon which is aligned with neocons, Indian and Israeli lobbyists.[/U]
India and Israel do not want the withdrawal. Israel wants to chastise Iran as well as wants the Pakistan's nuclear assets and nuclear program to come under the watchful eye of the western countries through IIA, or whatever.
Besides, security contractors, the US military and the people engaged in narcotics trade in Afghanistan do not want withdrawal also.
More than a hundred thousand security contracts are presently working in A-tan.
The US military knows that their budget will be reduced as soon as the withdrawal is announced. Narcotics trade is going on at a large scale in Afghanistan.
So these are some complex factors, that do not want withdrawal at all which has led to the NATO attack.
@azeegum
can you explain it in detail that how this NATO attack would serve for Pentagon?
Infact the question is ..if Obama wants withdrawl then who is going to stop him? isn't he in a position to deal calmly with Pakistan and on the other side he can draw his troops?
I want your comments..
I know this attack on Pakistan can serve for Pentagon but for how many days they can retain this strategy to stay here in Afghanistan?
isn't it seem illegical that Pentagone is showing disloyality to its country?

Please comment...

Regards
Reply With Quote