View Single Post
  #1  
Old Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Saimaawan Saimaawan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
Saimaawan is on a distinguished road
Exclamation The Unethical practice of defferring the allocation!

The Unethical practice of defferring the allocation!

Dear seniors and friends!

I would like to know your precious opinion on the practice of deferring the allocation. Don't you think (though legal) it's unethical???Because it has been observed that the person who defers his joining CTP usually does not join next year too and in this way the vacancy is wasted! and Above all the labour and hardwork of a candidate (i.e next in merit) is wasted as well, who would have joined if the allocated candidate had not deferred his joining.

I know a guy who was in our university, he was from a very humble background and had worked extremely hard to do CSS despite poverty and all sorts of problems. But friends, he could not come on merit, e.g he was on 81st position where as vacancies were only 80 and thus he neded the withdrawl of one allocated candidate to get the allocation . There was one allocated candidate, who was already in BPS 17 and was not interested in the allocated group and that’s why he had no intensions to join CTP that year or the next year. Everyone was sure about him that he would not join and he would refuse it. But despite it, instead of refusing and giving chance to that poor guy who was on 81st position, that allocated candidate decided to defer his joining. Later on he did not join next year too and in this way the vacancy was wasted!!!! The person on 81st position who badly needed allocation remained jobless for sometime and ultimately surrendered! yes dear friends he committed suicide!!! After his death his family is suffering in abject poverty today.I am an eye witness to this real story.

Dear friends every year in CSS, there are some allocated candidates who are already in good jobs, and owing to the fact that they don't get good groups they defer it, despite the fact that they don't have any intensions to join next year either! In my humble opinion, they must think about it. They should exercise only two options ---One: JOIN, Second: Refuse! they should not defer! Because their decsion to defer may cost another Life and the sufferings of generations of a family.And their decision to refuse and give chance to the candidate next in merit may save the future of a person and a family!

Your precious opinion views are welcome on this issue!

Last edited by Shooting Star; Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 03:21 PM. Reason: write in sentence case only.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Saimaawan For This Useful Post:
ahmar bhatti (Wednesday, August 29, 2012), Arslan Shaukat (Tuesday, August 28, 2012), mano g (Tuesday, August 28, 2012), sarfaraz shami (Tuesday, August 28, 2012)