Dear, that petition was denied because ED said that we want to promote competition but in the wake of these irregular inductions ED has no reply because if they wanted to promote competition, there is no room for such favouritism and this deputationists phenomenon was done malafide.You may not be much hopeful. You can not have clue from ED as ED has 36 deputationists out of total 50 seats of SOs and they discourage any such move which is against their interests as they are the candidates for such inductions. So please don't discourage anyone based on some vested interest.Nargis Shazia has already won a case of women quota.The reply submitted in irregular inductions case by ED is that we have shortage and that's why we are inducting these teachers etc but that shortage can be met by the CSS qualifiers who have 2/3rd quota in OMG that is 646 seats out of 937 OMG seats(750 duty posts+leave reserve and deputation reserve). Now there are only 150 officers of CSS in OMG. ED is sending only 50 seats because they asked capacity of CSA in 2008.But in 2008-09 CSS batches were 338 and 330 respectively. If shortage of space at CSA was an issue in 2008-09, same was not there in next batches when batches were of 200 strength and even on the pretext of space, rightfully qualifiers can not be denied of their rights as per article 27 of the constitution. Just contact the lawyers on the basis of these facts and they will show you the right path. We have consulted it with abovementioned lawyers already. So, chill and relax and don't stop people from trying only because you could not achieve or you have some interest.Contact Mr.Saleem Amjad in litigation wing. Thanks