View Single Post
  #4  
Old Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Syeda Bukhari's Avatar
Syeda Bukhari Syeda Bukhari is offline
42nd CTP (IRS)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2013 - Merit 75
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rawalpindi
Posts: 524
Thanks: 512
Thanked 461 Times in 249 Posts
Syeda Bukhari is a jewel in the roughSyeda Bukhari is a jewel in the roughSyeda Bukhari is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tehman Khan View Post
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread

Meaning

The rash or inexperienced will attempt things that wiser people are more cautious of.

Origin

'Fool' is now a more derogatory insult than it was when this proverb was coined, in the early 18th century. At that time a fool wasn't a simpleton, lacking in intelligence, simply someone who had behaved foolishly.

'Fools rush in...' has a precise derivation, in that it is a quotation from the English poet Alexander Pope's An essay on criticism, 1709:

Such shameless Bards we have; and yet 'tis true,
There are as mad, abandon'd Criticks too.
The Bookful Blockhead, ignorantly read,
With Loads of Learned Lumber in his Head,
With his own Tongue still edifies his Ears,
And always List'ning to Himself appears.
All Books he reads, and all he reads assails,
From Dryden's Fables down to Durfey's Tales.
With him, most Authors steal their Works, or buy;
Garth did not write his own Dispensary.
Name a new Play, and he's the Poet's Friend,
Nay show'd his Faults - but when wou'd Poets mend?
No Place so Sacred from such Fops is barr'd,
Nor is Paul's Church more safe than Paul's Church-yard:
Nay, fly to Altars; there they'll talk you dead;
For Fools rush in where Angels fear to tread.

The 'fools' that Pope targetted there were the literary critics of the day.

The line has been taken up by a string of notable writers since:

- Edmund Burke, in Reflections on the Revolution in France, 1790:

What ought to be the heads, the hearts, the dispositions that are qualified or that dare, not only to make laws under a fixed constitution, but at one heat to strike out a totally new constitution for a great kingdom, and in every part of it, from the monarch on the throne to the vestry of a parish? But — "fools rush in where angels fear to tread".

- Thomas Hardy, in The Woodlanders, 1887:

"He felt shy of entering Grace's presence as her reconstituted lover - before definite information as to her future state was forthcoming; it seemed too nearly like the act of those who rush in where angels fear to tread."

- E. M. Forster - the title of his first novel - Where Angels Fear to Tread, 1905.

- James Joyce, in Ulysses, 1922:

"And later on at a propitious opportunity he purposed (Bloom did), without anyway prying into his private affairs on the 'fools step in where angels' principle, advising him to sever his connection with a certain budding practitioner."
You stated the steps very nicely but in CSS English paper when we expand we have to do it in the form of one paragraph even the question says this. You cannot put in headings instead arrange all this in a way so as to make an impressive paragraph. And one other point is what I was told is that neither in essay nor in expansion we define the statement rather we have to start in such a way that the topic may get explained but without any definition and that too in expansion only, in essay we even don't do that (we don't explain the topic in introductory paragraph of essay).
Regards!
__________________
When you really want something, the whole universe conspires in helping you achieve it!!!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Syeda Bukhari For This Useful Post:
bathoor (Wednesday, May 29, 2013), Tehman Khan (Wednesday, May 29, 2013)