View Single Post
  #1  
Old Monday, June 03, 2013
Ayesha Chemist's Avatar
Ayesha Chemist Ayesha Chemist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 40
Thanks: 76
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Ayesha Chemist is on a distinguished road
Default CII point of view on DNA test for Identification of Culprit

The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII), however, has declared that DNA tests are not admissible as the main evidence in rape cases.

In a meeting of the council on Wednesday, religious scholars observed that while the tool could aid investigation into rape complaints, it could not be taken as evidence. It could, at best, serve as supplementary evidence but could not supersede the Islamic laws laid out for determining rape complaints.

“It cannot be treated as main evidence but it certainly is a great help in investigations,” said Allama Tahir Mehmood Ashrafi, a member of CII present at the meeting chaired by Senator Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani. The Quranic provisions calling for four witnesses would still be required as evidence in such cases, the scholars maintained.

The observation was made in response to queries sent to the council by different courts regarding the status of DNA tests as evidence in rape case. The standard police practice has been to register rape cases only after obtaining DNA test results and presenting the report before the court as the main evidence.

Now the Question is does a women needs four witnesses although DNA test proves who is criminal? and what if she is unable to provide four witnesses? Please through some light on four witnesses importance and DNA test?

Last edited by Arain007; Wednesday, June 05, 2013 at 09:19 PM. Reason: title correction
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ayesha Chemist For This Useful Post:
Saqib Bangash (Monday, June 03, 2013), Urma Waqar (Wednesday, June 12, 2013)