Thread: What do you think?
View Single Post
  #6  
Old Saturday, July 27, 2013
Bilal Hassan's Avatar
Bilal Hassan Bilal Hassan is offline
43rd CTP (PAS)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2014 - Merit 13
  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Deputy Commissioner Hunza Nagar
Posts: 1,090
Thanks: 195
Thanked 1,551 Times in 674 Posts
Bilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to beholdBilal Hassan is a splendid one to behold
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhmmdkashif View Post
"Constitution" and "Justice" are two different things, Constitution is 'a law determining the fundamental political principles of a government' whereas Justice is 'a quality developed in human beings by hundreds of thousands of years of evolutionary learning and progress' and therefore Justice is much more vital for human welfare than Constitution. The role of apex court, with all due respect, should be to do Justice while maintaining the social contract founded by the Constitution, however in this case it seems to have failed to do Justice and used Constitutional provisions to give favors which is clearly a 'bias'. I hate PPP, but I hate Injustice more
You are right brother, and the Thrasymachus view of Justice seems to be prevailing here, "Will of the mighty is the Justice". The judicial activism or precisely Might of Judiciary, we have seen brought forth goods as well as bads, no strange a fact, everything comes with pros and cons. But here one thing which seems to be plausible is that albeit Judiciary is being more active yet it has remained within the framework of constitution. The constitutional pundits are divided on their stance whether the judicial activism is having positive impact on the constitutional development in this country or not, they agree that constitution has been upheld. The judiciary must remain unbiased and neutral, this is better for its integrity, and Montesquieu's Theroy of Separation of powers is the linchpin for efficient and effective working of all institutions, every institution must remain within the powers assigned to it by the constitution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irtika View Post
Well I am not really shocked what judiciary has done. It is what judiciary always do. It do not see what it is doing and just hear and do what PML-N wants and what PPP do not want.
Judiciary is anti ppp and will remain. PML-N is gaining a lot from this so called free judiciary and PPP is losing a lot from this judiciary.
This country is heading toward one unit. Some institutions are running the country.
Your location is Sindh rural and your stance commensurate with that.

P.S: Dear do little work on tenses, you are using do with singular subject which is really shocking, however rest is fine.
__________________
Ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.
But when love is one sided, holding off is no more an option.