Friday, September 13, 2013
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lahore,Multan and Islamabad
Posts: 416
Thanks: 23
Thanked 470 Times in 277 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonny Quest
You can give your answer from any perspective. If you read Hindu Nationalist historians they brand him Plundrer or Looter. In short he was " raider in chief ". But Muslim historians respect him as " champion of Islam" he propagated Islam. Moreover he had Hindus in his Army.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using Tapatalk 4
|
bro not only hindu but mostly british historians regard him as plunderer and so far muslim historians regard him as what you already said but in different way because they say that he was the ruler who opened gates for muslims in sub continent that lasted for centuries  in short critically his motive was economic-cum-poltical so you have to answer that in this perspective though after detail discussion of historians you can prove that his motive was economic-cum-political
lane poole,jafar,ishwari,tame boost etc all ended his fantasy tail in this perspective because his invasion was religious never had enough evidence of being the primary reason stay blessed
|