View Single Post
  #89  
Old Tuesday, November 26, 2013
R3b3l's Avatar
R3b3l R3b3l is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: islamabad
Posts: 170
Thanks: 72
Thanked 49 Times in 37 Posts
R3b3l is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bear View Post
let us first revise and compare the rules for ce 2012 and ce 2013
CE-2012



ce-2013





now let us see what factors are involved to pass the whole exam.


there are four factors :
A . compulsory subject
B. optional subject
C. aggregate
D. viva voce


to pass the written and get interview call the conditions A,B,C are to be checked only. viva is a later process. so we ignore that on this stage .

let us make Truth Tables for the ce-2012 and ce-2013 and see what should be the criterion to pass as per stated rules .

for ce 2012 the condition is
"atleast 40% marks in any compulsory subject, 33% marks in any of
the optional subjects, or 50% marks in the Aggregate"

so the Boolean function should be " A and B or C"




for ce 2013 the condition is
"at least 40% marks in any compulsory subject, 33% marks in any of
the optional subjects, 50% marks in the Aggregate "

so the Boolean function should be " A and B and C"





you can see that fpsc violated its own rules in 2012 and in previous years ( according to what they said on their rules section.)
for example ,they were wrong at failing the candidates who passed 50% aggregate no matter what status they had in compulsory . Also they were wrong at failing those who passed all compulsory and all optional but got less than 50 % aggregate . ( you may seek help on Boolean functions from a philosopher or mathematician , because if "words " make "rules " then this above mentioned hypothesis will help you a lot in case you file a lawsuit or have a personal hearing )


ce-2013 rule according to Boolean function is very simple
its states that to get pass all three conditions need to get satisfied ,otherwise you shall be declared fail ( this is what happened to you . that this time they strictly followed the rule and went against the traditional customary law)


the long and short of this story is that their rules prior to 2013 were ambiguous . so you and the candidates of ce-2013 must get the benefit of doubt .


PS. to learn about truth tables ( which actually are very easy) see wikipedia and http://turner.faculty.swau.edu/mathe...library/truth/
i have presented the same argument in my earlier post. Though this time FPSC has acted as per it penned rules yet its past practices of deviating from its own stated rules can cause it great trouble and ultimately prove helpful to Nate and other students with similar case.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to R3b3l For This Useful Post:
Nate (Tuesday, November 26, 2013)