Agreed. What I am going to opine is: democracy is not in itself a superficially the best way of ruling throughout the world. Credit in fact goes to the people who make democracy the best way of governance. For instance, if a man like Hazrat Umar R.A rules a country like Pakistan in a democratic way, democracy would certainly become the best way. On the contrary, if a man like(not to be named; you know it :P) rules Pakistan in whatever you call the best way of governance, either decomcracy or Khilafat, it would be the worst kind of governance. Consequently, what I want to say: democracy, Khilafat and other forms, are nothing in itself unless a sincere and honest person rules the way.
Furthermore, the so called champions of democracy have been alleged to have their own militants' wings as well. They have been involved in many corruption related cases. Still they are claiming for the peace to be prevailed through democracy only. Whenever I hear the word democracy, the two family-based political parties come in my mind. :P There would be no fair democracy(or any form of governance) unless there are no fair rulers in this country.