CSS Forums - View Single Post

soft rock · #2 Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by mysterious me

The foreign policy of super powers is never based on sentiments but, Pakistan and china do an overt show of metaphoric interpretations for our relations. Is it really higher than mountains and sweeter than honey.

Well, I don`t think there is any other super power besides USA at state level at present in action

Plus,A post is there on this forum , probably i have posted i think, check it out, in that post the dark side of the foreign policy only of USA, the super power, has been given a shine to its dark side.

1. Iraq`s WMD case and US attack without Security Council`s approval is
is what shows the element of being sentimental US.

2. Central Asia over all Vs USA..what you think about that.

3. Palestine`s scenario, Israel backed up by USA having unlawful occupation there over the last 35/6 years . Is that what the UN maintains in its charter.

4. Why Hamid Karzai sahab is disliked by most of the citizens of Afghanistan and what bout the declared pre-plan of Taliban(s) for post-US Afghanistan .

5. Iran scenario and the sanctions against Iran ..making mess of the economy of a shia state iran..

See, after a country like Pakistan without flaunting which became "Atomic/nuclear Power"...faced any resistence from USA..obviously not..what you mean by sentimentality when Iran a state who seeks a outlet to become nuclear state..who creates the obstacle they are facing..Is not USA. European Union etc. How can you prove that F.Policy the Super Power(s), (USA), is based on sentimentality, my brother. The approach to foreign policy of USA has been discussed in my that concerned post, emphasizing that there is element of hostility in the foreign policy of USA, making its approach hostile towards its foreign policy.

Many analysts say that the Tragedy of 9/11 came as a gift to west.and since that time onward an uncontrollable turmoil is on..is there any obvious chance of harmony for the world without a diplomatic approach to foreign policies of the states which most have rare proportions of. And American foreign policy is not only for Muslim states which the analyst advertise as clash of civilizations. Or others as global village where the dominant culture is of west mostly having roots from that super power`s culture, which is materialistic, feminine,secular and unbalanced.

Brother , what do you mean by based on hostility, I maintain when the western secular culture and US is trying to overtake the divinity oriented culture of the pure religion of Islam, with lost of hostile element in the foreign policy of USA..and that's the cause why we see turmoil..brother...

The global peace and the call of today`s world for safety and security is not possible without a culture with fragrance of divinity.

Is not the the west trying to find out change for there peace..they want But don`t find out the inlet the need which they are blocking actually...

My brother, Why the singers of USA like Kat Steven become Yosuf Islam(s).

6. And What about Syria, Lebanon and other Muslim countries..why they are target of the US foreign policy....how come, its not the US foreign policy..which has the elements of hostility against the real natural chronic discreteness which the west and US needs but yet they are blind what they really need to give a way to what they need.

Absorb what the reality is, My Brother.

And much after all ,the global scnerio shows like the UNO should instead sign up for the membership of USA ..a country with false approach towards foreign policy, world is in dis-order brother. ..America is hard Super Power.. utilizing hostile approach towards its foreign policy mostly. Is not it ..Answer is yes..If the major part of that foreign policy and been busy in hostility, how can one avoid that such an approach towards foreign policy is wrong/false..I don`t think its makes one stop not to call it having hostile and false approach towards its foreign policy..

Quote:

Originally Posted by mysterious me

Improved relatiions between china and india with former investing heavily in latter's rail road and other infrastructure programmes have resulted in two-way commerce totalling close to $70 billion. Wouldn't it soften the chinese stance on kashmir issue, which is right now in favour of Pakistan.

In that post of mine" assuming I am the foreign minister of Pakistan" , India is diplomatic in approach towards its foreign policy mostly, and what the reality is. What about the history of tension between Pak and India relationship and the issue of kashmir an excuse for both countries to stay ignorant and away from letting in peace in the region .

Quote:

Originally Posted by mysterious me

Also, many believe that china is hijacking Pakistan's resources in guise of freindship. how much weight does this arument hold

Come up with proof..brother..Avoid what other believe.Make firm ur own belief. and reality based on facts matter..not what people believe without having logical bases for those beliefs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mysterious me

Does Pakistan need to revisit its relationship with China in changing scenarios.

Yes Pakistan needs a regular check on its foreign policy not only towards china but towards all other countries..to keep its foreign policy abreast..Like You updating the window of your PC. Do you update it only, when its corrupted ..Answer is no..Why ? Reason is to stay fresh and tidy when you turn on your PC to put it in action...I think You get what I mean. Similar is the nature of need to Pakistan..If needed they should update foreign policy as per the context. Window of your PC when u update it is non-corrupt condition posses the same files..like that of the Foreign policy of Pakistan..but when a file is corrupt and not up-to the requirement there is a need to repair /modify/improve..like you need certain software for you specific purpose,, my dear..!!!!

Regards Brother...

Regards Brother..