Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambivalent
End of the Topic
When Life throws you lemon make lemonade
We have discussed this topic in detail. But before moving on to the next topic, I want to add one thing: aspirants who are appearing in essay paper 2016 should contribute to this forum and should check how they organize their content in an essay to remove their mistakes. Our friends here are doing great deal of work by correcting the organization and relevance of topics. So, for everyone's benefit contribute aspirants. I am also thankful to Safir, Bonaparte, Waqar, M Usman, and Other friends for their regular participation.
The next topic is
I Disapprove of what you say, but I defend to death your right to say
Key Words: 'Disapprove', 'what to say', 'Defend', 'Death', 'Right to Say' so the main idea is "'Freedom of speech"".
Theme of the essay: Freedom of speech is a right that has to be defended forever, as everyone expresses his/her views/opinions in a way they desire ; however, opinions can differ from person to person and one person can disapprove the opinion of others, thus in this regard there is no compulsion of keeping and agreeing to only one set of opinion. |
Please check my outline. This outline took most of my time otherwise I would have posted introduction as well. Anyway, I will submit my introduction soon.
I disapprove what you say but I defend to death your right to say
" “Read not to contradict and confute; nor to believe and take for granted; nor to find talk and discourse; but to weigh and consider "
Sir Francis Bacon
Outline:
Introduction:
-Nature of right to say
-Adaptability of conscious mind and right to say
-Article 19, Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan on Freedom of speech
-Right to say under Universal declaration on Human Rights
-French Universal Declaration on Rights of Man
-Freedom of Speech in Islam
-Freedom of Speech in Hinduism- Bhagawat Gita
-Right to say in Christianity
1) Disapproved but defended to death the right to say
1.1) French philosopher Voltaire publications and his Right to say till death
1.2) Italian Philosopher, Galileo Galile opinion on heliocentrism, and Right to say to his death
1.3) Holy Prophet (P.B.U.H) challenged the wrath of Quraish for the glory of Islam till Hajjatul Wida
1.4) Martin Luther King, best known for African-American Civil rights movement defended till death
1.5) Nelson Mandella South African anti-apartheid revolutionary stood for right to say till death
2) Contemporary issues on right to say
2.1) Attack on notable journalists and their vehicles in Pakistan
2.2) Barring media from coverage and threats to their lives in war torn Middle East
2.3) French cartoonist Charlie Hebdo incident on Right to say
2.4) Concerns of French based “Reporters without borders” on attack on Journalists in various countries
2.5) Religious rhetoric speech without check does more harm than good in the name of Right to say
2.6) Lack of religious knowledge undermines the concept of Right to say
3) How to abstain misuses of Right to say without hindering the basic spirit of Freedom of Speech?
3.1) Correct Religious narratives must be promoted
3.2) Right to say must have some limitation so that inviolability on Fundamental Human Rights is ensured
3.3) Strategy of benevolence must be observed
3.4) Establishment of independent monitoring institution
3.5) Promotion of freedom of speech, but under code of ethics by educating the masses
3.6) Bolster and disseminate authentic information to counter wrong narratives based on Right to say
Conclusion:-