My microscopic effort:
Your sentence is correct except the pronoun,me;rather, it should be "i".Because in that particular case we have to stress upon the one who went to play;hence,we have needed nominative subjective pronoun.(This explanation itself illustrates you how perfect tenses are fixed up in a compound sentece)
So correct sentence could be:
It was indeed i, who went to play.
I was not interested to paddle my wheels lest i see the name of newpakhtoon, those guys who respected me deserves the respect as well.
Any how i hope we will pray fro each other and thanks for supporting me in feed back portfolios.
Mere tarraf se gift:
We use past perfect tense when already an action is done in the past and we proceed it further.
For example;
hunn!
I
went to bazar at 6 oclock, not i had gone to bazar at 6 pm.
Than question arises when this tense is being used,
Consider this example:
I told her that i
had gone to bazar.
She got the job when she
had lost her graduate course.
Here you need an intense verb in an independent clause to justify the existance of past pariticple along with auxiliary verb had.
While in above examples underlined parts are independent clauses.
Than,
in case of deconstruction of the above sentence:It was indeed i who went to play.
1.it was i(look intense verb is missing and it is compensated with auxiliary, so its a complement)
Note:we use object of the complement in objective case unless some stress is needed upon, which is elaborted by adverb 'indeed' in the aforementioned sentence)
it is concluded that intense verb is missing so slightest variation is necessary
Anyhow,
I hope you people have learnt from my effort and in case of discrepancy correction is appreciated.
