|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
please translate it into english
yah main tha jo khailny gya tha
yah main hi tha jo khailny gya tha |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
don't know what is ‘wacko'.is it part of the sentence?seems like English word |
The Following User Says Thank You to qublai khan For This Useful Post: | ||
talha king (Sunday, May 01, 2016) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
it was in fact me who had gone to play. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Your sentence is correct except the pronoun,me;rather, it should be "i".Because in that particular case we have to stress upon the one who went to play;hence,we have needed nominative subjective pronoun.(This explanation itself illustrates you how perfect tenses are fixed up in a compound sentece) So correct sentence could be: It was indeed i, who went to play. Quote:
Any how i hope we will pray fro each other and thanks for supporting me in feed back portfolios. Mere tarraf se gift: We use past perfect tense when already an action is done in the past and we proceed it further. For example; hunn! I went to bazar at 6 oclock, not i had gone to bazar at 6 pm. Than question arises when this tense is being used, Consider this example: I told her that i had gone to bazar. She got the job when she had lost her graduate course. Here you need an intense verb in an independent clause to justify the existance of past pariticple along with auxiliary verb had. While in above examples underlined parts are independent clauses. Than, in case of deconstruction of the above sentence:It was indeed i who went to play. 1.it was i(look intense verb is missing and it is compensated with auxiliary, so its a complement) Note:we use object of the complement in objective case unless some stress is needed upon, which is elaborted by adverb 'indeed' in the aforementioned sentence) it is concluded that intense verb is missing so slightest variation is necessary Anyhow, I hope you people have learnt from my effort and in case of discrepancy correction is appreciated. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ursula For This Useful Post: | ||
nawepukhtoon (Saturday, April 30, 2016), qublai khan (Saturday, April 30, 2016), talha king (Sunday, May 01, 2016) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Dear ursula thanks a lot for your generous reply. then I welcome you from the core of my heart to be among us once again.
coming to the actual point, I would say it is wrong to say it was me. it was I is 100 per cent correct. besides the past tense in the subordinate clause, I think , is wrong. the sentence says ' gaya tha' not ' gaya'. for gaya we use past tense that is went. but for 'gaya tha' we always use past perfect tense. this had been taught to us in our matric classes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
welcome back Ursula,
I was also suspicious of that translation.thanks for correction. Sent from my A10 using Tapatalk |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
No discrepancy from your side. Its a sighhhhh for me. Quote:
Sir, problem is that we don't follow the exact time of reference in lower grade classes( I mean ye sab chawlyan main bhy prty rhy hun) iss lye mjhe inhain ghallat kehne main koy buray nhy. Lastly i explained it after a long long consideration.Ask me individually and i do hope that in that case we will reach at nice conclusion. Any how its fun for me to argue and than counter argue. Because by doing so we will learn inshallah. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ursula For This Useful Post: | ||
qublai khan (Sunday, May 01, 2016), talha king (Sunday, May 01, 2016) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Could you kindly tell me what do you do for your English ? I read your posts and your written expression is pretty good. Kindly throw light on it. Jazak'ALLAH Khairan. Regards, RMKamran.
__________________
Nasru minal'lahi wa fat'hun qareeb |
The Following User Says Thank You to RMKamran For This Useful Post: | ||
ursula (Sunday, May 01, 2016) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Any how its fun for me to argue and than counter argue.
Because by doing so we will learn inshallah.[/QUOTE] Again arguments and counterarguments with you but I will stand firm on my stance because this has been taught to us by sir amjad who is now a csp officer in audit and accounts. regards. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Inshalah, I will do here, so keep your fingers crossed. Once manjanbazms post in off topic lounge has elaborated a good point and i noted it down,thus i decided to provide this service. In return. I just want from you folks to have a dua for me. I hope you guys will enjoy my good explanation. Quote:
Anyhow, I am not imposing my lunatic idea. You all alone could consult any good international site or even a book. P.S. I have a serious doubt on exploring the world of English. Read some internationally recognized goood authors. I hope arguments must be finished off without any further elaboration in case of your disagreement. |
The Following User Says Thank You to ursula For This Useful Post: | ||
RMKamran (Sunday, May 01, 2016) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PPSC one Paper Preparation Material all in one | Monk | Past Papers | 22 | Friday, July 17, 2020 10:57 PM |
Books for English | Princess Royal | Grammar-Section | 20 | Thursday, July 21, 2016 05:46 PM |
English Books Study Collection (2009) CD | Waseemtabish | References and Recommendations | 9 | Sunday, May 06, 2012 12:44 AM |
Languages by Countries | Snobbish | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 0 | Friday, June 15, 2007 11:27 AM |
English | waqas ahmed | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 0 | Thursday, May 31, 2007 09:54 PM |