Main kal cnfrm kr k baata du ga....waisy mjhy ni lgta k hoga screening test

same here

__________________
You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough. (Mae West)

First of All, I believe it's not a rumor. It's going to happen and it'll.Very Bold and Wise step by FPSC . ( In all aspects )

FPSC isn't here to facilitate us in getting selected. It's up to FPSC to make changes in Syllabus, Eligibility, Age.

How dare you think about filing a petition?
How dare you think about protesting? ( In case, if these changes happens.)


If You are " ALIM FAZIL " , then come into the arena of Competition and prove your Worth. Otherwise, Do what You have to do. ( Excluding CSS )
Because, such changes don't bother a well prepared candidate. Let Go of things You can't change, Focus on things You can.

Read through the Resume of Mr. Abdul Wajid Rana (On FPSC's site ). You can find that Mr. Abdul Wajid Rana also submitted a report on reforming CSS.

" Report on Reforming the CSS Competitive Examination, Updating the Syllabus for the Competitive Examination, developing the Syllabi for Screening Test . " ( Mr. Abdul Wajid Rana's resume, Page # 10 )


Go through the Interview threads, You can find some questions regarding Civil Service Reforms. In final Interviews of last 2 - 3 yaers, FPSC members asked numerous questions about Syllabus Reforms, Selection criteria, e.t.c..

Does it make some sense or not?.....Decide Yourself.




If you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change.
( Wayne Dyer )


Change the changeable, accept the unchangeable, and remove yourself from the unacceptable.
( Denis Waitley )


P.S: First, be a part of Policy Making process and then give your valuable suggestions regarding new Re-Grouping that what's not suitable for You.

__________________
" Knowing is not enough; We must apply
Willing is not enough; We must do. " (Bruce Lee)

FPSC screening test is possible this year but it should be free of cost for aspirants.

Any change to be brought in the CE procedure should be made effective three or two years later in the notification, not immediately. Doing so will be injustice to the candidates of CSS-2016 and we will protest against FPSC, "if injustice is done".

I guarantee you that your belief will not carry any weightage in the final decision regarding syllabus change.


(I am also seriously against the petition but )I fancy it is a free country and everyone has the right for filing a legal petition. How naive and foolish on your part to render such so called brave statements which deny the basic rights of individuals.

The revised syllabus and its distribution will only assist graduates from recognized and top universities. The urdu medium cadre of aspirants (and even engineering and medical background holders) will lose all hopes. So, it is not about alam fazil, it is about justice and equality of rights of different educational backgrounds.


Do you know the difference between report submission and report acceptance? And by the way, do you have any idea about the combination of federal bodies which will eventually decide the fate of syllabus change? It is not about the chairman of FPSC alone. Numerous parties and individuals have to be taken aboard.

According to your logic, they just asked those questions to take some input. How are you so sure that they were not testing the critical and analytical abilities of a candidate?


It is not about change rather it is about the speed with which things happen. Syllabus has to change eventually but it should be notified at least 1-2 years beforehand. Secondly, if one only needs to be in policy making process for giving suggestions, then why the hell interviewers were being asked to render their feedback. Were they a part of a policy making institution at the time of interview? You are refuting your own logic. Please do not opt philosophy in CSS.

__________________
The one who is most deserving of thanks and praise from people is Allah

Css forum has kept the standard for a long time. No rumours were allowed to spread from the forum. However, now I feel the forum do not really bother to attest any news. As a result, the forum has provided a base for baseless statementsand claims. For instance, what is the credibility of this news. What it is a self made word file printed and then scanned. For instance, anyone can easily make a table of optionals of one's own choice and then one can take a picture of its printed page. It will spread and spread without any known origin. The bottom line is that this is a baseless page having an unknown origin, so don't belive in it, and continue your studies.

1- Neither mine nor yours guarantees are necessary for finalization of Re-Grouping.

2- I am also of the view that every citizen has right to file petition but why for this cause?...Just because new Re-Grouping will not facilitate Professional degree Holders.
Such petitioners should put some extra efforts on new subjects. ( Not to visit courts every third day ). If they can suck massive books of Medical field then it's not a " Mission Impossible " to read some extra subject for the sake of becoming a Doctor / Engnr turned Bureaucrat.

3- How can you claim that new Re-Grouping will not assist Urdu medium cadre? If with old grouping,aspirants with Urdu medium background can grab their desired groups then they can excel with new grouping too.

Most of Medical background aspirants opt for Psychology ( only subject which is bit related to their medical study ).Otherwise,Don't they opt for Scoring Subjects? ( Like Punjabi,International law, Public Ad, Jounalism, Indo-Pak History , Islamic History & Culture , Regional languages ). So how can they lose all hopes?

4- Never knew about such complexities of Policy Making. Thanks for showing me new horizons of Policy Making.

5- The purpose of above 2 logics was only to convey a very simple point that such a change in syllabus is under FPSC's pipeline. Because a FPSC member submitted a report and Interviewer were also raising questions about these reforms in Final Interviews.

I didn't mention that they have approved the new Re-Grouping.Did i?

I also highlighted that " Does it make some sense or not?.....Decide Yourself. "




6- Read the above clarification.Because i'm only responsible for what i say, not for what you understand.

Again, Above logics in my previous post was a hint that there will be some changes in Syllabus. Near future or far, FPSC knows better. But it'll.

Read between the lines and then advise me either to opt Philosophy or not.
Firstly,Correct your own superficial and enlightened philosophical approach of intermixing the exact context of my statements.

__________________
" Knowing is not enough; We must apply
Willing is not enough; We must do. " (Bruce Lee)

Today i confirm from Fpsc Member... he told that there is no proposal of Regrouping.... but proposal of Screening test forward to Cabinet for Discussion....And Fee Of screening test is separate.. who pass test screening test is allow to appear in written exams

are you sure about it?