Is it wrong to criticise America?

[God Fearer]

Friends.. while writing on War on Terror or any other issue, Kerry Lugar Bill for example, can we criticize America?

I mean, I think that it was America who dragged us into war on terror and I am very bitter in my views against America. Can I go on with enumerating reasons to prove my point OR I have to act like a diplomat and not attempt such questions where I get a chance to criticize the government policies of Pakistan and it's so-called 'friend' America?

Also tell what does CARs stand for? Central Asian Region(s)?

[marilatif]

Originally Posted by God Fearer

Friends.. while writing on War on Terror or any other issue, Kerry Lugar Bill for example, can we criticize America?

I mean, I think that it was America who dragged us into war on terror and I am very bitter in my views against America. Can I go on with enumerating reasons to prove my point OR I have to act like a diplomat and not attempt such questions where I get a chance to criticize the government policies of Pakistan and it's so-called 'friend' America?

Also tell what does CARs stand for? Central Asian Region(s)?

dear if u think that u can prove ur point then u may criticiz, but i think first u raise ur those points at which u want to criticize america,since then u will further clear ur points. iscuss them either here at forum or with ur freinds.

otherwise there are always positives and negatives. so u may do that but with some positive points.

CARs stands for Central Asian Republics

[God Fearer]

Interior Motives of US War on Terrorism:

If we take a look of Political disputes like Iraq, Afghanistan, the Interior motives of war on terrorism are:

• To get hold of natural resources of Muslim countries, either by the policy of friendship or confrontation.

• To malign Muslim and to damage the ideologies of Islam specially Jihad to project Islam as a religion of intolerance. The fear factor is that Islam still is spreading in the West at a faster pace, 4500 embraced Islam after 9/11.

• To stop the rise of orthodox Muslim governments. They are doing it in the name of democracy. They are changing the elected governments. e.g. Iran’s government, is being isolated by imposing sanctions. They are there to protect monarchies in Gulf States and a Military rule in Pakistan.

• To ensure a greater Israel on Arab Land for the satisfaction of American jewfish lobby.

• To spread its own culture. If a nation dies it’s a national death but if a nation dies of cultural death, it’s all over. The United States is permeated its culture in the countries on the name of terrorism. As in Iraq, they made dance clubs in the Green Zone. The uniform of new force of Iraq i.e. identical as it matched with USA.

• To check the nuclear technology of the Muslim countries like Iran and Pakistan.


Note: I collected this data from this forum only.. It's not my original work but I agree to the above facts!!

[tx_ned]

Originally Posted by God Fearer

Interior Motives of US War on Terrorism:

If we take a look of Political disputes like Iraq, Afghanistan, the Interior motives of war on terrorism are:

• To get hold of natural resources of Muslim countries, either by the policy of friendship or confrontation.

• To malign Muslim and to damage the ideologies of Islam specially Jihad to project Islam as a religion of intolerance. The fear factor is that Islam still is spreading in the West at a faster pace, 4500 embraced Islam after 9/11.

• To stop the rise of orthodox Muslim governments. They are doing it in the name of democracy. They are changing the elected governments. e.g. Iran’s government, is being isolated by imposing sanctions. They are there to protect monarchies in Gulf States and a Military rule in Pakistan.

• To ensure a greater Israel on Arab Land for the satisfaction of American jewfish lobby.

• To spread its own culture. If a nation dies it’s a national death but if a nation dies of cultural death, it’s all over. The United States is permeated its culture in the countries on the name of terrorism. As in Iraq, they made dance clubs in the Green Zone. The uniform of new force of Iraq i.e. identical as it matched with USA.

• To check the nuclear technology of the Muslim countries like Iran and Pakistan.


Note: I collected this data from this forum only.. It's not my original work but I agree to the above facts!!

Above mentioned views are weak to establish on sound logical basis, as somehow they are axaggerated. So in my personal opinion, you should not go to the extreme edge of even side.

I do respect your collection, but on forum you know there is a debate for every view point so be neutral while forwarding them or present some logics to prove them if you agree.

Your points can easily be neutralised as there was always a power play just for access of resources of other lands, nations and civilizations. You may find 1000 examples in history. e.g.

1) Why did Muslims invade other lands?

2) Did they not write the similar letters to Roman or Persian civilizations with age of 5000 and 1000 years respectively?

* We have a better system (Islam) so you have to replace your system with this one

or

* You may continue with your existing system if you pay the tax "Jizya"

or

* Have a war with us to decide the fate of system of your country

3) In so-called Muslim rule over India (712-1857 with Arab, Ghaur, Slave, Khalji, Tughuluq, Syed, Lodhi ad Mughal dynasties) you may hardly find Iltutmish, Alau-din Khalji and Aurang Zeb ... only 3 personalities who can be claimed religious personalities; if i am not wrong.

* What was it then? Capturing the foreign resources; nothing else !! Isn't it??

4) Culture belongs to the ruling elites as attitudes travel from top to bottom. You may find a lot of examples within India by Muslims (Building styles and Cities formation and mosques designing etc ... even changed the flag and capital for times); so why should US be blamed to do so in her occupied territories?

I have just presented some logical points which might be there inside the examiner's mind. They might be dangerous for your marks as checking is absolutely with the examiner so:

* You have to be neutral enough

or

* You have to be much logical to prove your view

Kind Regards

NOTE: I AM NOT EXPERT TO SUGGEST WITH THE CONTEXT OF CSS EXAM, SOME OTHER FELLOW WILL DEFINITELY CLARIFY YOUR POINT. I HAVE RESPONDED YOU ON GENERAL GROUNDS; NOT FOR CSS EXAM

[tx_ned]

Originally Posted by God Fearer

Interior Motives of US War on Terrorism:

If we take a look of Political disputes like Iraq, Afghanistan, the Interior motives of war on terrorism are:

• To get hold of natural resources of Muslim countries, either by the policy of friendship or confrontation.

• To malign Muslim and to damage the ideologies of Islam specially Jihad to project Islam as a religion of intolerance. The fear factor is that Islam still is spreading in the West at a faster pace, 4500 embraced Islam after 9/11.

• To stop the rise of orthodox Muslim governments. They are doing it in the name of democracy. They are changing the elected governments. e.g. Iran’s government, is being isolated by imposing sanctions. They are there to protect monarchies in Gulf States and a Military rule in Pakistan.

• To ensure a greater Israel on Arab Land for the satisfaction of American jewfish lobby.

• To spread its own culture. If a nation dies it’s a national death but if a nation dies of cultural death, it’s all over. The United States is permeated its culture in the countries on the name of terrorism. As in Iraq, they made dance clubs in the Green Zone. The uniform of new force of Iraq i.e. identical as it matched with USA.

• To check the nuclear technology of the Muslim countries like Iran and Pakistan.


Note: I collected this data from this forum only.. It's not my original work but I agree to the above facts!!

Please do read "Opponent" in place of "Muslims/Islam" in your post, you may agree with the title "Interior motives are always same for every war" then and find the answer regarding your marks.

Regards

Request: Learned Moderators, Please do not merge this post with my previous one as the true meaningful purpose requires to keep them seperate

[marilatif]

so dear i think some of ur points have been cleared. still i would have some arguments against ur points but as papers are going to start so due to time limit i cant do.

let u think more on them.

regards

[tx_ned]

I am very bitter in my views against America

Can you please explain this sentense for a worthy debate ?

Kind Regards

[God Fearer]

Yeah but after exams... InshAllah. Hope you understand!

[tx_ned]

Originally Posted by God Fearer

Yeah but after exams... InshAllah. Hope you understand!

All the best for your exams !

But please consider my previous post and pose yourself as a neutral instead of going to any extreme.

May Allah Pak bless you with everything you want !!

Aameen

Kind Regards