Dialogue is the best way to combat terrorism

Plz remember here focus is on Dialogue( a proposed solution) not on terrorism.


i think logical flow of the essay will be as follows
1. What is terrorisms, its plain definition, complexities
2. Approaches to combat terrorism
3. Issues with those approaches( Why they are not giving the result?).....You must highlight the reasons of being dialogue the best way to combat terrorisms
4. Dialogue ---an approach to discuss the roots of terrorisms
5. Why dialogue not so popular.......
6. How dialogue can be an effective one ( creative suggestion to make dialogue an ideal solution to terrorism)
7. conclusion............You must convince your reader about the failure of all other approaches to curb terrorism and state logical and effective reasons that dialogue is the best approach among them.

plz guide me i want to write an essay on Dialogue is the best way to combat terrorism.tell me how to search net, how to arrange.i want to give orignal expressions.

Dialogue is the best course to combat terrorism

Outline

A) current scenario.(terrorism is a global phenomenon (gwot) therefore it calls upon the joint efforts to curb it. Subsequently, for joint efforts dialogue is a willy-nilly. Below current world scenarios do support the aforementioned notions.)

1) SAARC dialogue (Islamabad) to combat terrorism through "regional police".
2) Pakistan-China dialogue to make joint efforts to combat terrorism.(military exercises and sharing technology)
3) Pakistan -India dialogues on terrorism.
Mumbai issue, embassies on afghan border.
4) situation in Afghanistan;
West now tackling the grave issue of terrorism through dialogue. Like London summit, peace jirgas, luring taliban through economic aid($500m aid) and tacking taliban on board etc.)
5) Israel trying to create peace through peace dialogue with palestine.



B) how dialogue can be effective?

1) joint efforts. Therefore creating peace. (creating alliances)
2) strategic importance ; e.G. Control of influx of refugees through porous
Boundaries.
Strategic dialogues, (recent examples, us-india dialogue and
Pakistan-us dialogue in washington)
3) reducing weapons and arms and ammunition proliferation.
4) sharing intelligence.(e.G. Dialogues with srilanka can provide us with the right information because recently srilanka had tackled the problem quite effectively)
5) military dialogue. (kyani- mchyrsal dialogues)
6) reduce of "collateral damages" in war-torn area.
7) identifying true enemy.

C) sectoral dialogues to combat terrorism;

1) rehabilitation process in area.
2) eschewing "trust-deficit" phenomenon.
3) averting religious ideologies.
4) ideological fight; dialogues rather than arm fighting can be beneficial.
E.G. Us-vietnam war, soviet-afghan war resulted in fiasco of the superpowers. Because of the miss-apprehension of the true nature of fight)

D) composite dialogues to combat terrorism;

1) revising madras's education curricula.
2) creating job opportunities. Therefore, restricting unemployed of becoming puppets in the hands of the extremists.
3) overcoming energy shortages; because scanners and arms detectors do not work properly and do not provide required surveillance due to protracted outages.
4)rejuvenating us effigy in muslim world; muslims reckon usa as a potential enemy of islam. Therefore, global war on terrorism effects.

E) combating terrorism with arms fighting devoid of dialogues, is a futile endeavor. (give example like israel-palestine issue, still unresolved, a glimpse of afghan issue is also pertinent)

G) suggestions.(repeat above examples in a context of suggestion)

Conclusions

First of all I would like to say that Umer has left no stone unturned in guiding you properly and comprehenisvely. One thing that I want to clarify is, only social problems are written in the form of Issues, Causes, Effects and Remedies. These you usually cause and effects essay where different approach is practiced. The topic you have choosen is argumentative essay where you have to win the battle with your arguments and logical support. While saying issues we simply mean the concepts and ideas associated to that particular problem that is prevalent in the society.

Now lets move to your questions one by one.

For collecting relevant material you have to search out the importance / significance of dialogue for dealing issues. Some relevant examples from near past to support your arguments.

For arrangement definately you have to draw an outline and then arrange the material accordingly.

If you want to give your original expression do write in your own words. First read as much as possible relevant to your topic and then rephrase yourself.

Here I am reproducing an outline that I had rephrased from original outline of Saleeqa at a following link:

http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-past-...-2010-a-7.html

I hope this outline will help you to shape up your essay.

Introduction

Dialogue indispensable to curb terrorism

Current scenario with reference to USA and Afghanistan

Significance of dialogue

1. Facilitate to figure out real cause
   
2. Lead to the peaceful solution
   
   [*}Halt terrorist activities
   
3. Remove sympathies of public for terrorists
   Example: Achievement of Pak-Army behind apparent failure in Swat Operation

Why dialogue is significant to curb corruption?

1. Current wave of terrorism is Ideological war
   
2. Terrorists commitment to their cause
   
3. Anti-western sentiments amongst common men
   
4. Tribal Norms
   
5. Terrorist assert themselves as freedom fighter
   
6. Availability of finance to the terrorists

Does invitation for dialogues amounts to surrender before unjust demands of terrorists?

Scope of dialogue must include

1. Establishment of peace
   
2. Distinction between different motives of terrorists
   
3. Empowerment of locals

Dialogues must be accompanied with other measures

1. Social development of violent region
   
2. End of discrimination against Muslims
   
3. Promotion of interfaith harmony

Conclusion

__________________
"When Allah leads you to the edge of the cliff, Trust Him Fully, only 1 of 2 things will happen either He will catch you when you fall or He will teach you how to fly"

Dialouge is the best way to combat terrorism

What is terrorism?
Different ways of containing/combating terrorism
i-Use of force
ii-effective security network
iii- dialogue
Merits and demerits of each method
Examples from history...( Hudebia Pact, peace of westphalia, congress of vienna, league of Nation, UNO)
Why Dialogues tend to be more effective in today's world
analysying the causes of terrorism
Best strategy to persue Dialogues( e.g. weakening the opponents by other methods to compell them to come to table)
Incorporatating all the stakeholders
gaining public support
reforms for eradicating the support for terrorists
conclusion