I neither defined "great nations' nor defined "Winning without fighting" I assumed that the author is talking about war vs peace/diplomacy.After an introduction my outline went like this




Philosophy Behind Winning Without Fighting:
Political gains
Economic gains
Social fabric remains intact

All religion propgate Peace:
Hinduism
Christianity
Buddhism
Judaism
Islam

History Supports This View:
The pact of hudabiya
Victory of Makkah
Peace of Westphalia

Nations Who Adhered To This Philosophy:
Japan
China
European Union
South Korea

Nations Who Learnt This Lesson The Hard Way:
Pakistan
Afghanistan
US
North Korea

Effects Of Ignoring This Philosophy:
Collosal human suffering
Rampant poverty
Crippled economy
Political Chaos

A Way Forward:
Compassionate human heart
Transform UN into word democracy





I had couple of spelling mistakes in outline as well as in main body.Wrote simple english and my writing was not upto the mark.Quoted Sun Tzu, Milton and Dalai Lama.Couldn't manage time, spent almost 1 hour on thinking and crafting outline so I could only write 1000 to 1200 words.Exam Pressure undercapacitated me at that time!
Reward: 40
Hope it would help someone.

Thanks dear but I think that examiners and especially essay checkers dont know nothing about history. Many aspirants attempted this essay and gave examples of USA and UK. Sir you have also given the example of European Union which was embroiled in brutal wars of World war 1 and 2.

Well dear coming to the main point, are you sure you write 1200 words? because I think I got awarded 20 marks for writing a short essay of 1100 1200 words.

Yes! I'm dead sure about words