change in the syllabus of Pakistan Affairs

[Adnan Gul]

Dear friends, how do you see the change in pakistan affairs syllabus, is it a significant change, or the same syllabus is elaborated in more comprehensive manner??

[lums]

Originally Posted by Adnan Gul

Dear friends, how do you see the change in pakistan affairs syllabus, is it a significant change, or the same syllabus is elaborated in more comprehensive manner??

I have also the same query....

[Antalpur]

Originally Posted by Adnan Gul

Dear friends, how do you see the change in pakistan affairs syllabus, is it a significant change, or the same syllabus is elaborated in more comprehensive manner??

I see major changes in the example. For example, the pre-partition part is only talking about the Muslim settlement and in the sub-continent and the reformist movements for the Muslims of the sub-continent, whereas there is no mention of the struggle for Pakistan.

[asma mehvish]

Originally Posted by Antalpur

I see major changes in the example. For example, the pre-partition part is only talking about the Muslim settlement and in the sub-continent and the reformist movements for the Muslims of the sub-continent, whereas there is no mention of the struggle for Pakistan.

i think reformist movement for Muslim include all portion which is in struggle for Pakistan

[hafiz mubashar]

To me, now Pak Affairs seems not a history like subject. There is no detailed study for Pre-Partition Movement which was there in the previous syllabus. Secondly, now a person should cover the current issues more than that of history topics. Just first part of the syllabus indicates the reform movements and the educational and political institutions. So, there is massive change in the syllabus.

[asma mehvish]

hafiz mubashir i don,t agree with according to me all topics are still included because with out preparing history topics in detail how can we describe about reformist of Muslims may be i am wrong but i understand this from syllabi

[Life ka network]

From 2014 Pak affairs Paper is like Current affair paper.More importantly, now its mandatory to get 40 marks in it.

[hafiz mubashar]

The thing I wanna propound is that there is no mention for the historical struggle for Pakistan, rather educational and institutional elements are highlighted and evaluated. The traditional historical topics like partition of Bengal, Minto-Morley Reforms, Lucknow Pact, India Act of 1919, Nehru Report, Quaid's 14 points, Round-Table Conferences, 1935 India Act and so on and so forth are not included and not needed to be prepared. Rather, the post=partition period should be prepared and that too in a different scenario than that of prior one.

I would also request the other fellows to second me or correct my assumption.

[Life ka network]

It doesn't matter because we have to prepare these topics for GK, PCS tests, NTS tests and interviews. These are so simple and basic topics of Matriculation.Even most of us know whole IndoPak history but feel reluctant to opt it due to its scoring trend.

[Adnan Gul]

Then what book should we follow in the perspective of changed syllabus??