Friday, May 03, 2024
01:33 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS 2009 Exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #61  
Old Monday, September 20, 2010
38th CTP (OMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 223
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 58
Thanks: 143
Thanked 44 Times in 25 Posts
Sultan Rahi is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zbaloch_204 View Post
Implementation of SC verdict on women’s quota.
LAHORE: The Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) has asked the Establishment Division to adjust 14 probationers from the 2008 batch who would stand removed from their CSS allocations in the wake of a Supreme Court decision calling for the implementation of 10 per cent quota for women before September 10.
A senior FPSC official told The Express Tribune that the FPSC had clarified that if the Establishment Division failed to comply, the commission would itself make changes in the CSS 2008 allocations list. This, he said, would affect not just the 14 probationers in question, but also all others who have already completed the one-year 37th common training programme (CTP) at the Civil Services Academy (CSA).
The official said that following the SC verdict 14 more women would be accommodated in the CSS 2008 (37th CTP) and 17 in CSS 2009 allocations.
He said that the FPSC would likely send the allocations list for CSS 2009 to the Establishment Division in two days.
The Supreme Court directed the FPSC in the last week of August to change the manner in which it allocated the women candidates in CSS. It ordered the FPSC secretary to implement the SC ruling within 15 days – by September 10, 2010.
The federal government had announced, on May 22, 2007, the reservation of a 10 per cent quota for women in all federal jobs. The quota was in addition to the posts they would secure on open merit.
The FPSC, however, denied seats to 13 successful women candidates from the Punjab in 2008. These candidates first moved the Lahore High Court and later the Supreme Court.
Nargis Shazia Chaudhry, one of the 13 petitioners, had requested the court to change the method of allocation. She had argued that first the general merit seats should be filled, on the basis of the provincial formula, and then the 10-percent women quota should be applied to the remaining women candidates.
She had also requested that the open-merit seats vacated by women, who moved to better groups under the quota, be filled by women only.
The FPSC criteria earlier allowed filling up the open-merit seats vacated by women by whoever happened to be next on the merit list. This, the petitioner argued, resulted in less women getting CSS allocations which was not declared policy.
After the SC ruling, an FPSC official said, a seat vacated by a woman can only be filled by another woman.
He said that Nargis, who would get a better group under the quota, would now be replaced by another woman. He said that the FPSC had submitted a review petition but it was unsuccessful.
In the wake of the verdict, he apprehended, several candidates allocated seats in 2008 would get affected as there would be no vacancies to adjust them. Keeping this in mind, he added, the FPSC had requested the Establishment Division to make room for the 14 male candidates by creating new vacancies.
Several probationers, who are currently completing their CTP at the CSA and may be affected by the SC ruling, told The Express Tribune that they would move the SC if they are not accommodated.
They held that next year they would no longer be eligible for taking the FPSC exam (on account of age restrictions) and after getting a year’s training it would be very hard for them to adjust in any profession other than civil service.
Of the 14 probationers, 12 belong to the Punjab and two to the Khyber-Pukhtunkhwa. There occupational groups are information, railways and postal services.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 6th, 2010.

Source:http://tribune.com.pk/story/46939/fp...-css-discards/
Dear as per my information dated 20 Sep 2010(Mon/today), no allocation list has been forwarded to Estab Divn, so far. FPSC is still working on CE-2009 allocations, it will take time.
Regards
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old Monday, September 20, 2010
38th CTP (OMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 223
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 58
Thanks: 143
Thanked 44 Times in 25 Posts
Sultan Rahi is on a distinguished road
Default Today I wrote to Secretary, FPSC

To,
The Secretary,
FPSC, Islamabad.
Sir,
It is submitted that 10% women quota in public/civil services was promulgated by the Govt of Pakistan with the view to make women a part of public policy. It was started when the literacy rate of women was not so good. But the scenario is quite different now. In all universities there are 50-70% female students while rest of the 30-50% are the male.
Forgoing in view, it is requested to please abolish 10% women quota in public/civil services and turn all the vacancies to open merit.
Yours truly,
---Sd---
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sultan Rahi For This Useful Post:
Abdullah Nayyar (Monday, September 20, 2010), S_Ranjha (Monday, September 20, 2010)
  #63  
Old Monday, September 20, 2010
DEADLYDOCTOR's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: R.I.P(Rest In Peace)
Posts: 742
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,143 Times in 374 Posts
DEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sultan Rahi View Post
Dear as per my information dated 20 Sep 2010(Mon/today), no allocation list has been forwarded to Estab Divn, so far. FPSC is still working on CE-2009 allocations, it will take time.
Regards
Vacancies
The Establishment Division reported 289 fresh vacancies. After inclusion of 99 carried over vacancies, the total
vacancies increased to 388. Over and above 388 regular vacancies, eight fresh and one carried over vacancies are
reserved for Armed Forces Officers for Competitive Examination 2009. Calculations/distributions of these vacancies
on the basis of Merit, Provincial/Regional quota and 10% reserved for women quota, have been worked out. These
have been forwarded to Establishment Division for confirmation/approval. On receipt of approval, these vacancies will
be announced in the press for information of the candidates.
Subsequently allocations will be made on the basis of
their merit, domicile and preferences.

source:http://fpsc.gov.pk/icms/admin/docume...%20edition.pdf
__________________
Reality is something you rise above.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old Monday, September 20, 2010
38th CTP (OMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 223
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 58
Thanks: 143
Thanked 44 Times in 25 Posts
Sultan Rahi is on a distinguished road
Default to deadly doctor

FPSC has already publically announced the number of vacancies. Same are available on fpsc website.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old Monday, September 20, 2010
dr.ali.zaidi's Avatar
38th CTP (MLCG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 486
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Karachi
Posts: 181
Thanks: 22
Thanked 128 Times in 73 Posts
dr.ali.zaidi will become famous soon enough
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sultan Rahi View Post
To,
The Secretary,
FPSC, Islamabad.
Sir,
It is submitted that 10% women quota in public/civil services was promulgated by the Govt of Pakistan with the view to make women a part of public policy. It was started when the literacy rate of women was not so good. But the scenario is quite different now. In all universities there are 50-70% female students while rest of the 30-50% are the male.
Forgoing in view, it is requested to please abolish 10% women quota in public/civil services and turn all the vacancies to open merit.
Yours truly,
---Sd---
Dude i endorse your view fully. However, I dont think that anyone could do anything now. cuz if govt. tries to retract this back, all these women will make such unprecedented uproar. It is true for them that when i comes to take the privileges, they make an innocent face and try to carve our for themselves more than what they deserve. They do this on the plea of them being weaker gender and being unable to perform at par with stronger counter part.
However, when they realize that something is going in male's way due to their weakness, their attitude suddenly changes. The previously weak woman now start claiming that they can do everything equally good as man or sometimes even better. The receive all those relaxations and perks on the basis of this hypocritical attitude.

Khush Rahye
Dr. Ali
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dr.ali.zaidi For This Useful Post:
Abdullah Nayyar (Monday, September 20, 2010), S_Ranjha (Monday, September 20, 2010)
  #66  
Old Monday, September 20, 2010
38th CTP (OMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 223
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 58
Thanks: 143
Thanked 44 Times in 25 Posts
Sultan Rahi is on a distinguished road
Default

The friends, who agree my view point, are requested to second me, unanimously, in writing to all those who are at the helm of affairs, particularly the FPSC and Estab Divn.
Regards
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old Monday, September 20, 2010
DEADLYDOCTOR's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: R.I.P(Rest In Peace)
Posts: 742
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,143 Times in 374 Posts
DEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really niceDEADLYDOCTOR is just really nice
Default

@sultan rahi

bro! i did not post to tell vacancies.it was about forwarding to establishment.
Calculations/distributions of these vacancies
on the basis of Merit, Provincial/Regional quota and 10% reserved for women quota, have been worked out. These
have been forwarded to Establishment Division for confirmation/approval. On receipt of approval, these vacancies will
be announced in the press for information of the candidates.
__________________
Reality is something you rise above.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old Monday, September 20, 2010
38th CTP (DMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 253
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: karachi
Posts: 59
Thanks: 9
Thanked 37 Times in 25 Posts
samiullah shaikh is on a distinguished road
Default

the vacancies have already been approved by the establishment division and available on fpsc website and notified thru press as well.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to samiullah shaikh For This Useful Post:
Sultan Rahi (Wednesday, September 22, 2010)
  #69  
Old Saturday, September 25, 2010
Farishta's Avatar
38th CTP (CTG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 270
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 42
Thanks: 32
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Farishta is on a distinguished road
Default hell o everyone

Hello


Anybody, have you any clue about allocations announcement. Don't you think it is too much late, without notifying anything, as reason for delay. Does it not seem kind of unfair, rather humiliating to the waiting/suffering candidates.
One tends to think, this is the worth of our time in their eyes.

Or perhaps this is due to our unreal expectations!

what are other friends thinking about it, kindly share...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Farishta For This Useful Post:
Sultan Rahi (Monday, September 27, 2010)
  #70  
Old Monday, September 27, 2010
Parineeta's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lahore
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Parineeta is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sultan Rahi View Post
Dear as per my information dated 20 Sep 2010(Mon/today), no allocation list has been forwarded to Estab Divn, so far. FPSC is still working on CE-2009 allocations, it will take time.
Regards
Hi all,

Can some body explain to me in simple lay man's language that how this verdict of SC would affect on women quota as well as the allocation procedure??

I shall be highly obliged...


Regards,
__________________
Many of life's failures are people, who did not realize how close they were to success when they gave up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
allocations


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Constitution of the United States Muhammad Adnan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 3 Saturday, February 01, 2020 02:25 AM
All about Pakistan Muhammad Adnan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 78 Wednesday, May 16, 2012 09:50 PM
Constitutional Law: SELECTED CONSTITUTIONS OF THE WORLD Ahmed Ali Shah Constitutional Law 17 Monday, May 09, 2011 10:01 PM
18 Amendment Trancript moss4u Current Affairs Notes 0 Friday, June 11, 2010 12:22 PM
Chronology of Pakistan Aarwaa Pakistan Affairs 1 Thursday, May 24, 2007 11:53 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.