Monday, April 29, 2024
01:03 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS 2011 Exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Saturday, December 17, 2011
mani1's Avatar
40th CTP (DMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 27
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lahore
Posts: 393
Thanks: 114
Thanked 358 Times in 138 Posts
mani1 has a spectacular aura aboutmani1 has a spectacular aura aboutmani1 has a spectacular aura about
Default Detailed Analysis: CSS 2011 was more scoring than 2010

I decided to do some research on DMCs of failed candidates of CSS 2010 written and 2011 written examinations to check whether the notion that 2011 candidates scored much higher was valid or not.

The pre-dominant belief of all stakeholders at the moment is that alot of qualifiers scored above 700 in written. I believe, after looking at the results of my data, that this isn't the case. While 2011 qualifiers did scored more than 2010 qualifiers, the difference isn't that huge as it appeared.

Average score of CSS 2010 Failed Candidates: 602 (Sample size 70)
Average score of CSS 2011 Failed Candidates: 622 (Sample size 73)


All DMC's were taken from respective threads on the forums. Unusual scores of below 500 were not accounted due to various reasons.

As we can see the difference is only of 20 marks. It is a big difference but not substantial one as I was fearing. Now lets take a look at another interesting aspect.

Number of candidates above 700 in CSS 2010: 2
Number of candidates above 700 in CSS 2011: 8


Now maybe those additional 6 candidates in 2011 (over 2010) got lucky. Maybe it was their 2nd or 3rd attempt or maybe they were the only cases; an anomaly from the trend (Yes I do tend to think of positives). Lets take them out of calculation for both 2010 and 2011

Average score of CSS 2010 Failed Candidates (excluding 700+): 598
Average score of CSS 2011 Failed Candidates (excluding 700+): 610


This shows that candidates scoring more than 700+ were not an anomaly from the trend. People indeed scored more this year by a margin of 20 points.

Next logical step would be to

1)Analyze subjects of those 8 people who scored more than 700 in CSS 2011 and find common subjects. If the subjects are same, we can safely assume an anomaly in the trend otherwise interview would be major deciding factor in allocation

2)Analyze DMCs of allocated 2010 aspirants to find out exact scores for specific groups (to extrapolate on 2011)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mani1 For This Useful Post:
Khadijha Arib (Saturday, July 14, 2012), usman khalid (Saturday, December 17, 2011)
  #2  
Old Saturday, December 17, 2011
Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Roll no 9709
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 30
Thanks: 19
Thanked 38 Times in 15 Posts
shah3431 is on a distinguished road
Default

Whoa! that's a lot of research I reached the same conclusion after going through the DMCs. Fingers crossed
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to shah3431 For This Useful Post:
Khadijha Arib (Saturday, July 14, 2012)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High scoring & low scoring - Whats the reality? DEADLYDOCTOR Subject Analysis 49 Monday, May 02, 2011 01:00 AM
Commonwealth games 2010 imran bakht Current Affairs 0 Monday, October 11, 2010 02:42 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.