#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dear All,
I am an Advocate High Court. A couple of months ago on this forum, I floated the idea of filing a petition against the malpractices that surfaced at Faisalabad during CSS 2013. To my dismay, I did not get the desired response. However, the situation has changed in the wake of yesterday's shocker of a result ; tehrefore, it is hightime we went for a fresh writ petition against FPSC under Article 184 of the Constitution of Pakistan ,1973. The following points will make up the petition : 1. The culprits of the Faisalabad scam have not been brought to book. They are still at large. 2. Instead of clamping down on the alleged criminals through forensic technology and booking them under the law of the land, FPSC went for a re-exam of around 250 people from Faisalabad. This is sheer injustice to the rest of the candidates who sat the exams in February. 3. How can a select number of people ( from Faisalabad) get extra 6 months in a competitive exam? 4. What surety does FPSC have that the alleged culprits did not procure the question papers of CSS 2013 exam which were despatched in the same way as the answer books were? 5. The fundamental constitutional rights of those who appeared in CSS 2013 have been violated. Clearly, Articles 9,18,25 , to name a few have been infringed. The constitution makes clear in no uncertain terms that " all citizens are equal" and expressly prohibits discrimination with respect to jobs. The Faisalabad re-exam has manifestly contravened these constitutional provisions. 6. FPSC has gone against its press release which laid down that the result would be declared by September. Hence, it has deceived thousands of CSS candidates. 7.The abysmally low number of passed candidates is unprecedented. Howcome those who were in the top 50 in CSS 2012 failed to qualify even the written part in 2013? In view of the aforementioned legal arguments and many others which will be added to fortify the case in due course. There are strong grounds to challenge the LEGALITY OF CSS 2013 and get it declared NULL AND VOID . If I get support from those who appeared in CSS 2013 we can go ahead with this case as soon as possible since the spadework has already been done. Please remember that this is an issue of immense public importance.The more the number of petitioners ( CSS 2013 candidates) the stronger the case will be. P.S. My e-mail address is included in my profile. Those interested can e-mail me for further correspondence. Thank you. Please take it seriously. Remember, there is no other way you can get undone what has just been done to you people! |
The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to Wheeler For This Useful Post: | ||
abdurraufkhalid (Thursday, November 21, 2013), AzizHamza (Friday, November 22, 2013), Chamroti (Thursday, November 21, 2013), dms664 (Friday, November 22, 2013), emranali (Friday, November 22, 2013), Fakhar baloch (Tuesday, November 26, 2013), ifiriseagain (Friday, November 22, 2013), kiki (Wednesday, November 27, 2013), king khan jadoon (Thursday, November 21, 2013), LonelyEngineer (Friday, November 22, 2013), Mujtaba Abbas (Thursday, November 21, 2013), nauman mahsud (Wednesday, November 27, 2013), Raja4u (Thursday, November 21, 2013), sadafnoorelahi (Thursday, November 21, 2013), salman mehdi (Thursday, November 21, 2013), salmannnnn (Thursday, November 21, 2013), SehrishKanwal (Thursday, November 21, 2013), Tabish Shah (Thursday, November 21, 2013), VetDoctor (Thursday, November 21, 2013), waqas Nawaz (Thursday, November 21, 2013), zabee8 (Thursday, November 21, 2013), Zeerain shah (Thursday, November 21, 2013), Zeeshan Shah (Thursday, November 21, 2013) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
i totally support your initiative. its worth a try. You must go ahead with this. a lot of aspirants will join u against this shameful act of FPSC.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to salmannnnn For This Useful Post: | ||
nauman mahsud (Wednesday, November 27, 2013), Raja4u (Thursday, November 21, 2013) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
useless...and absolute wastage of time plus energy
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I support you, and also find a way to re-check the papers through a legal process in accordance with constitution/act because this css2013 result looks the same like the SPSC 2008 scandle.
Atleast we are not giving up coz we know what we have done, and what were the hurdles we faced during all this time. I was preparing since 2009, closely looking at each papers and observing everything and have studied real hard in this attempt and i wont let it waste, i will challenge fpsc. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tabish Shah For This Useful Post: | ||
Raja4u (Thursday, November 21, 2013), venomous sophie (Thursday, November 21, 2013) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
exactly, don't give up. some one rightly said
winners never quit, quitters never win hum csp nai tu baqee ko kun banne dain aur woh be illegally. 6 months ka extra time kisi kee bhi kismat badal sakhta tha. we should go for the petition.finally, someone is talking sense. i strongly support you. and i would say to others. "kabhi apnay rights k lyay uthh bhi jaya kero" |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sadafnoorelahi For This Useful Post: | ||
nauman mahsud (Wednesday, November 27, 2013), Raja4u (Thursday, November 21, 2013) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I am also with you. The result is a gross injustice to all those serious hard working candidates who burnt theri midnight oil and this is what they get. FPSC should explain how success rate dropped to 2.09 percent only.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nuchi For This Useful Post: | ||
Raja4u (Thursday, November 21, 2013) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hard luck friend , prepare for CSS 2014, time is already running out .
Petition mafia cannot give you anything . Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
__________________
There is always room for improvement , it's the biggest room in the house. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to awais274 For This Useful Post: | ||
MINUSoptimist (Thursday, November 21, 2013), soft rock (Thursday, November 21, 2013) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Come what may this result will be challenged. The matter is not whether we win the case or not but to satisfy our soul and to stretch the wrong doer FPSC before court.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Raja4u For This Useful Post: | ||
venomous sophie (Thursday, November 21, 2013) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Raja4u For This Useful Post: | ||
kainatsaba (Thursday, November 21, 2013) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Constitution of the United States | Muhammad Adnan | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 3 | Saturday, February 01, 2020 02:25 AM |
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab | sajidnuml | Constitutional Law | 5 | Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM |
Timeline: Judiciary vs executive | Call for Change | Current Affairs | 0 | Tuesday, June 19, 2012 06:14 PM |
All about Pakistan | Muhammad Adnan | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 78 | Wednesday, May 16, 2012 09:50 PM |
Bhutto's statement in Supreme Court of Pakistan.... | Saleeqa Batool | Discussion | 1 | Wednesday, April 25, 2012 12:22 PM |