Friday, April 26, 2024
07:21 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group II > Physics

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, May 10, 2009
moonsalpha's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 103
Thanks: 38
Thanked 72 Times in 39 Posts
moonsalpha is on a distinguished road
Post Deformed Special Relativity: An Alternative to String Theory?

Deformed Special Relativity: An Alternative to String Theory?

Is string theory really the only possibility for unification of quantum gravity and general relativity? A brief outline of one of the alternatives.

Modern theoretical physics seems to be focused heavily on string theory while it is a very rewarding area of physics which will no doubt help provide us with a much deeper understanding of our universe. However or should other possibilities for the combination of Quantum Gravity with general relativity into one theory that functions not only in the tiny quantum world, but also in the macroscopic world of general relativity.

There are many reasons why string theory is the focus of more research than other areas many of the political, which I do not intend to go into. The reason why I find deformed special relativity so appealing is largely due to the premise of Occam's razor, simply stating that the simplest solution is normally the correct one.

The reason why I feel that this is applicable to Deformed Special Relativity, is that DSR does not require the existence of extra compacted dimensions in addition to the four easily detectable macroscopic ones. String theory relies upon tight control of physical constants and the properties of extra dimensions in its attempts to unite quantum gravity and general relativity. DSR however simply alters Einstein general relativity slightly by constructing itself entirely from Lorentz groups rather than partially from Lorentz and partially from Newtonian groups.

The main difficulty in uniting General Relativity and Quantum gravity is essentially dependent upon the fact that in Quantum Mechanics the Planck length (the minimum length corresponding to detail that can be resolved due to the uncertainty principle) must be completely invariant, whereas in general relativity its

Special relativities basic premise is that no objects velocity can exceed that of light , but DSR's altered beginnings in Lorentz groups mean that it's premises are that no object's velocity can exceed that of light and also that no length can contract (appear shorter to an observer, depending on the observer's velocity), to a length shorter than that of Planck length.

I believe that this limit it places upon length will allow for it to unite quantum mechanics and gravity into one mathematical treatment applicable on all scales, however the difficulty emerges from the fact that no one has yet come up wit ha generalized form of DSR that would allow for it to interpret gravity, as special relativities do not account for acceleration, this is small step it took Einstein ten years to create a general relativity from his specialized form.

For a more technical discussion.
__________________
-Better an ounce of luck than a pound of gold.
--Yiddish Proverb
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Globalization of World Politics: Revision guide 3eBaylis & Smith: hellowahab International Relations 0 Wednesday, October 17, 2007 03:13 PM
Mass Communication Mystichina Journalism & Mass Communication 1 Tuesday, July 31, 2007 08:50 PM
Albert Einstein ahsanghalib General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Saturday, December 16, 2006 06:58 PM
Problem Of The Big Bang Theory Sureshlasi General Science & Ability 1 Friday, December 08, 2006 04:20 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.