Monday, April 29, 2024
08:10 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group V > Agriculture & Forestry > Agriculture

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, April 25, 2010
uzma khan youzaf zai's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Balochistan pakistan
Posts: 268
Thanks: 290
Thanked 575 Times in 180 Posts
uzma khan youzaf zai has a spectacular aura aboutuzma khan youzaf zai has a spectacular aura aboutuzma khan youzaf zai has a spectacular aura about
Default Managing timely export

Managing timely export

By Aftab Ahmad



PAKISTAN has become self-sufficient in wheat and is able to export two million tons of the commodity. But the decision to export from the existing stock has come at a time when firm estimates about the size of current crop is yet to be available and the official procurement drive to gain momentum. It does not seem to be appropriate.
Some analysts fear that wheat crop might be lower than its target of 25 million tons and the last crop of 23.5 million tons, due to drought and shortage of irrigation water. Others have shown optimism lately, saying that the wheat crop is going to be a bumper one and may be close to 23-24 million tons.

The government of Punjab has raised its procurement target from four million to five million tons. However, according to some press reports, farmers in Sindh are not satisfied with the procurement arrangements and they are selling their produce to private parties against cash payments, even at a price lower than the procurement price of Rs950 per 40 kg.

Following the government decision to export two million tons of wheat, buying by the private sector may pick up in coming weeks, possibly making it difficult for the government to achieve its procurement target.

If the government’s procurement target is not achieved and the private sector purchases bulk of the crop, artificial shortage of wheat accompanied by an increase in wheat/wheat flour prices may occur.

The latest government decision to export wheat brings to the mind a similar decision taken a few years ago. The decision, at that time, was also taken in anticipation of bumper wheat crop. However, when final estimates were received, the crop turned out to be of a considerably smaller size. Accordingly, speculative elements were able to take full advantage of the situation. They created artificial shortage of wheat/wheat flour in the open market and sold their stocks at prohibitive prices.

As per the government’s decision, wheat was exported at a time when the international wheat prices were at a lower level. Later, when the government had to import wheat the same year to meet the shortfall, it had to pay considerably higher price for the imported wheat, since the international wheat prices had risen by that time.

While announcing the decision, the prime minister had observed that the decision would benefit the farmers.What the PM had actually meant was that because of the export demand for two million tons, prices of wheat would not witness decline and wheat growers would continue to receive a good price for their produce.

It was to achieve the same objective, when the government of Punjab lately decided to raise its procurement target from four to five million tons. It is, no doubt a step in the right direction to protect the interest of growers, so that they may be able to focus on maximization of production.

However, at the same time, it is the duty of the government to safeguard the interest of the consumers also. It should, therefore, be ensured that export of wheat does not result in shortage and higher prices of wheat/wheat flour. The physical exports of wheat should not be allowed until the procurement target has been fully achieved. By that time, a clearer picture would also emerge about the size of the wheat crop and the government would be in a better position to consider as to how its export decision could best be implemented.

Over the last one year between April 2009 and April 2010, availability of wheat/wheat flour had remained satisfactory and the price of wheat flour also remained stable in the open market. This was because the government had procured a higher quantity of wheat and, at the same time, it did not allow any export of the commodity during the year. Besides, upward revision of the procurement price of wheat from Rs625 per 40 kg to Rs950 per 40 kg also helped in checking the smuggling of wheat across the borders.Thus, the item remained freely available in open market throughout the year, although at a higher price.

The international wheat prices currently stand at a considerably lower level. According to online reports, US and EU wheat prices stand at $197 and $169 per ton, respectively, while top-grade wheat could attract a price of $225 a ton. These prices, when converted into local currency at the exchange rate of Rs85 to a dollar, work out to Rs14 to Rs19 per kg. On the other hand, the local wheat procurement price stands at Rs950 per 40 kg or Rs24 per kg. It may, therefore, not be possible to export wheat at current prices, after buying wheat from the local market at Rs24 per kg and adding mark-up and transportation charges to the cost.

But, world commodity prices have always been subject to fluctuations. According to online reports, lower wheat prices at the moment are attributable to higher global production/expected production from the 2009-10 wheat crop. Global wheat stocks are, also, expected to hit their highest level since the 1980’s. However, these lower prices are likely to prove a disincentive for the wheat growers at the time of sowing wheat crop, which could result in lower production from the 2010-11 wheat crop. Thus, there is a possibility that the international wheat prices could witness a rising trend once again in 2010-11, after remaining at a lower level in 2009-10.

For a country like Pakistan – having meager internal and external resources and a higher poverty level – it is always advisable to attach the highest priority to food security. The government should avoid all such policies and actions that could have an adverse effect on the availability and stability of food item prices.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trade liberalization in pakistan xenia Economics 1 Sunday, April 20, 2014 10:34 PM
U.s. Nuclear Policy Toward Iran fahad269 News & Articles 0 Sunday, December 23, 2007 08:15 PM
Problems of Pakistan and their solution Mazher Essays 10 Thursday, November 15, 2007 12:29 AM
Investment Climate In Pakistan sardarzada11 Pakistan Affairs 13 Thursday, April 27, 2006 09:55 PM
IMF-International Monetary Fund free thinker Current Affairs Notes 0 Thursday, April 27, 2006 10:25 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.