Friday, April 26, 2024
04:19 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Optional subjects > Group VI > Muslim Law & Jurisprudence

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Saturday, July 16, 2011
Zoyee's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chakwal
Posts: 908
Thanks: 897
Thanked 1,478 Times in 681 Posts
Zoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud of
Default Faskh (Judicial Separation)

AOA Fellows..!!

I am going to start a thread on Muslim Law topics. I'l try my best to provide exact and authentic material on different important topics of Muslim Law off and on.

Faskh (Judicial Separation)


Nature and Description of Faskh

Faskh literally means annulment. It differs from talaq and other forms of dissolution of marriage in legal structure and its effects.

Faskh occurs in different forms. Some forms need decree of the court and some other do not need it. For example if the husband fails to provide maintenance to the wife, she may petition for judicial separation. On the other hand, if it is established that spouses are within prohibited degree to marry each other, then it will not need decree of the court. They will instead be automatically separated upon knowing the fact of prohibition.

Faskh requires ruling by the court in the following instances:

• Failure of the husband to provide maintenance

• Harm of wife

• Desertion by the husband or his imprisonment

• Separation due to Khula if husband does not agree to her request

• Disease or defect in the husband or his impotency

• Option of puberty

• Mutual imprecation


Faskh does not require decree by the court in the following instances:

• Invalidity of contract

• Existence of in-law relationship between the spouses

• Separation due to il’a

• Apostasy of wife or husband


The annulment of marriage in these cases takes place by the operation of law. It does not need pronouncement of repudiation by the husband or the order of the court.

Source: Family law in Islam by Dr. Muhammad Tahir Mansoori


Request for prays,

Zoyee
__________________
Main ne Allah ko apne iradon ke tootne se pehchana ... !!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Saturday, July 16, 2011
Zoyee's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Chakwal
Posts: 908
Thanks: 897
Thanked 1,478 Times in 681 Posts
Zoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud ofZoyee has much to be proud of
Default

Grounds for Judicial Separation

Separation due to Failure to provide Maintenance


Hanafi says that judicial separation is not permissible on the grounds of failure to provide maintenance. The argue that the husband will either be solvent) one who does not have money) or insolvent (one who has money). If he is poor and insolvent, we cannot blame him for this, because Allah says,

Let him who has ample means spend in accordance with amplitude; and let him whose means of subsistence are scanty spend in accordance with what God has given him: God does not burden any human being with more than He given him (and it may be well that)God will grant after hardship, ease. (65:7)

They further maintain that during the time of Holy Prophet (SAW) there were poor and rich among the sahabah but not a single example of judicial separation is found due to the inability of the husband to provide maintenance.

Maliki, Hanabali and Shafi jurists are of the view that even if the husband is poor, wife has a right to take the matter to the court. The court would either compel the husband to pay maintenance or would invalidate the marriage contract. (Mughni-al-Muhtaj, vol.3)

Separation due to Non-Provision of Maintenance

Maliki is of the view that the separation would be tala-i-raja’I and the husband would be granted the right to go back to his wife if he becomes able to provide maintenance to her during the ‘idda’ period.

While Shafi and Hanbali say that separation would take place by the order of qadi and will be regarded as invalidation of the marriage contract and therefore the husband would have no right to go back to her wife. (Al-Ahkam al-Shariyyah by Zaki uddin Sha ‘bah)

Regards,
__________________
Main ne Allah ko apne iradon ke tootne se pehchana ... !!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab sajidnuml Constitutional Law 5 Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM
draw backs of our judial system nd how can plz check and give comment for improvement Samra Ahmad Essay 0 Friday, April 06, 2012 10:31 AM
Material for Interview Preparation khuram_khokhar CSS 2010 Exam 122 Tuesday, January 25, 2011 03:20 AM
The Judicial System in Islam Daredevil39 Islamiat Notes 0 Friday, September 10, 2010 10:55 PM
Judicial Activism Soulreader43 International Relations 0 Saturday, February 13, 2010 07:10 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.