[QUOTE=mysterious me;700276]our outlines are somehow similar but i think i missed out islamic perspective :(
lets keep our fingers crossed[/QUOTE]

Did almost the same way but not so many headings. Wrote a lot on two polar views, with Sweden and China on one side, while USA and ex-Soviet on the other sides.
Overall it turned into a debate because sometimes war is inevitable. And other times it is just wastage of a whole generation.

Hoping to get 65 like last time IA :)

attempted No. 07
 

Outline:

1. Introduction

2. Instances where fighting caused destruction.
a. World War I & II
b. Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
c. American invasion of Iraq
d. War of Independence 1857, its consequences.
e. American invasion of Afghanistan.
f. fall of Mughal empire.

3. instances where nations won without fighting.
a. Treaty of Hudaibya.
b. Nelson Mandela's efforts.
c. Muslim expansion in Sub-continent, due to simplicity, equality, brotherhood.
d. Iran interim Deal.
e. Syria deal.
f. Aman ki Asha & Samjhuta express: a step towards winning without fighting.
g. Talks with Taliban: another steps to avoid fighting.

4. Conclusion.

Those who wrote against the topic great nations win without fighting, kindly share ur outline

[QUOTE=zeeshan marwat;699830]You are right,but i dont agree to your last statement that dual approach is an utter failure.First of all this essay was not about Pakistan higher Education sectors,yes you can mention scenario Of Pakistan higher education(private)as an example but with utmost care so that your essay do not squeeze to Pakistan only.Secondly,the approach towards essay like this is of three kind,either go in favour of the first aspect or another and another method is to present the two sides and then as judge favor and appreciate the one aspect according to your arguments.[/QUOTE]

dear brother, dual approach means favouring both perspectives....favouring privatiztion as well as non-privatization.... for me, one must be specific and must favour one view with logic......dual approach shows confused personality....

I used this quote with reference of pakistan
As joining sectarianism, terrorism and extremism all together.
As great nations win without fighting and pakistan can also curb these issues without fighting. Besides my essay was short because of poor time management. It was around 10 to 12 pages only :( that will destroy me :(. And yes! overall exams were havoc :(

Great nations win without fighting:
share only main points of outline not further sub points.
1) introduction
2) viable importance in international platforums,i.e UNO
3) Great leaders make them nations great
(¡) nelson mandela...an apartheid leader...south africa now an emerging country&economy
(¡¡) Mather Muhammad...malaysia an asian tiger
(¡¡¡) Ronaldo Regan...4oth american president,organized a team of intellectuals to sought out American crisis
4) Lesson learned from history
(¡) japan a real example after world war two its two cities removed from the map of world...a industrial hub
(¡¡) china a largest cluster of population, instead of population a liability make it asset and now a largest economy of the world
(¡¡¡) Hitler showed his power in germany...intellectual deficit increased and its universities become barren(its a side effect of violence and war)
6) status of great nations in progress
its further 6 to 7 sub point
7)Is Pakistan has a potential to achive a position in comity of nations:if YES
- Through democracy
- through strong economy
-through good governance
- through peace
- through accountability
-through national unity
- through youth
conclusion

One point missing great nations educationally progress.European universites illuminate the whole world...top ranking universities of the europe.

means i will fail :( :(((((((((((((((

Out Line...Give your valued opinion seniors.
Great Nations win without fighting.
Probably no nation is rich enough to have both war and civilization, make your choice we cannot afford both.
(Albert Ellis)


Great nations cannot fight to cause sour wounds on surface of mother earth as:

Greatness lies in peace.
Prosperity lies in peace.
Peaceful nations leading the globe.
Peaceful nations a demand not a deed.

Greatness cannot be achieved by fighting.
Fights...humans betrothing humans.
To befriend an enemy is to finish an enemy.
Victories of force....short lived.
Winning without fighting is long lasting.



Great Nations that won without fight...A glance at history
Arabs...establishment of Muslim rule and changed dimensions.
Scandinavian Nations..... Germany, Finland etc.
Establishment of Pakistan.

Only Peace can make progress.
China..... a sleeping giant.
Malaysia...Robust economy
Srilanka, Finland, Switzerland.


Fights can cause downfall of nations;
Fall and decline of great nations: Paul Kennedy
America....fighting webs entangled and engulfed its economy.
India wasting its potential.


Peace is constructed not fought for.
why do nations fight?
when suppressed and oppressed (Egypt, Syria,)
when justice fails to deliver (Tunisia, Kashmir).
when minorities are injured (Myanmar).

Establishment of peaceful nations: dire need of globe

Green planet getting red...
Love humanity indiscriminate of caste and creed.
Let,s not wage wars in name of Peace
Let true Democracy deliver
Address the problems of humanity
Let us establish the great nations to heal the wounds of mother earth.
If a nation wants an everlasting winning, it has to win without fighting as great nations win without fighting.

Come close, remove your sandals from your feet as the place we are standing is holy earth.

[QUOTE=faiza shafi;700898]means i will fail :( :((((((((((((((([/QUOTE]

Keep hope high. Mayoosi Kufar ha.