|
Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only. |
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A Detailed Analysis Of, an Israeli Attack on Iran!!
Please read the link below ....
http://judicial-inc.biz/Sunburn_Missile.htm The Coming Showdown In Iran Iran Has Nuclear Ambitions And Israel Says " No " " As head of Israel - we will not allow this. " Iran's Defense Minister Has Had It With Israel Any Action By Israel Will Be Seen As US-Sponsored Israel Is Stockpiling For An Attack F-15's The USA has given Israel 30 long-range F-15's, at a cost of $48 million each. Bunker Busters Israel bought 5,000 bunker-busters Known by the military designations GBU-27 or GBU-28, "bunker busters" are guided by lasers or satellites, and can penetrate up to 10 metres of earth and concrete. The Plan Israel will take off with three squadrons of six F-15's - fly over Iraq, and hit Iran's three key facilities. The US is expected to provide satellite information and refueling as the Israeli jets exit. Israel's False Flag Iran will see this as an attack by America, and will threaten to retaliate. Israel will launch a Sunburn 22, taking out a carrier, and Iran will get blamed. The Attack Is Possible Because of These Missiles The attack is possible because of these missiles, as well as the location. The US Fifth fleet sits in the Persian Gulf - which is a small bay surrounded by rugged mountains and a 20-mile-wide entrance. These missiles are unstoppable, and the 5th fleet is in range of Iran's land facilities. Sunburn Missile...........Unstoppable Specs The Raduga Moskit anti-ship missile is perhaps the most lethal anti-ship missile in the world. The MOSKIT is designed to fly as low as 9 feet at over 1,500 miles per hour, faster than a rifle bullet. The missile uses a violent pop-up maneuver for its terminal approach to throw off Phalanx and other anti-missile defense. Warhead - 200 KILOTON NUCLEAR Range - 90 MILES Size - 31.9 FEET Speed - MACH 2.5 AT SEA LEVEL SS-NX-26 Yakhonts 180 mile range and unstoppable The Yakhonts 26 replaces the Sunburn 22. There is absolutely no way to avoid the missile. Range 250-300 Km Speed Mach 2.5 Exocet missile Iran has 300 of these. Exocet missiles cost approximately $250,000 in 1970, and older versions are selling for $ 75,000. Maximum Speed Mach 0.93 Maximum effective range 65 km Iran's Ballistic missiles Amount Range Shahab- I 300 320 Km Shahab- 2 100 500 Km Shahab- 3 a handful 1300 Km CSS-8 Missiles 200 Chinese 200 150 Km Iran's missile capabilities Iran Has An Air Force and Navy F-14 Tomcats Iran has an Air Force of 320 fighters, of which 100 are F-14 Tomcats and SU-29 Migs. They also have a capable AA defense system of missiles. Iran Air Force Mig-29 Iran Has Subs Equipped With Exocet Missiles How The Attack Plays Out After Watching Destruction of Iraq, The Iranians Will Be Forced To Respond Because Iran is already at total war footing, the attacks will escalate out of control in a matter of days. * Israel hits Iran's nuclear facilities * Iran goes to Alert One * Israel hits a US Carrier and blames Iran * US hits Iran's navy in northern Persian Gulf * Iran attacks with all it's missiles Iran has already calculated their response, and they realize their only option is a massive attack. Iran is sitting on a stockpile of Exocet, Sunburn 22 and SS-NX-26 Yakhonts missiles. The Fifth Fleet sits at Qatar, and it is within range of the Sunburn-22 and Yakhonts. Iran is said to have commercial freighters equipped with Exocets that will be in port at the time. Once Israel hits the US carrier (similar to the USS Liberty) then Iran will have no choice but to defend itself. The 5th Fleet sits in a lake surrounded by Iran's rugged mountains, and will be decimated by the missiles. The US fleet will arrive in the Indian Ocean, but will be helpless because the straits of Hormuz will be showered by a Phalanx of hundreds of Exocets. Iraq's Insurgents Regroup At the same time, the Iraqi insurgents will begin a counter- offensive. A major attack on the Green Zone would take out most of Iraq's foreign administrators. It's very possible that the Iraq occupation could turn very deadly and costly. Add to this offensives on Iraq's isolated towns, and the occupiers would be in a multiple quagmire - the occupiers now are surrounded. As supplies and ammunition begin to run out, the status of US forces in the region will become precarious. Straits Of Hormuz The occupiers will become the besieged The US will be cornered - if they try to escape, they will be slaughtered in the Straits of Hormuz. With Iran's enormous missile capability, the US will have two choices - either go to the UN for peace, or escalate to an all-out nuclear attack on Iran. Flow Of Oil Stops With enough anti-ship missiles, the Iranians can halt tanker traffic through Hormuz for weeks, even months. With the flow of oil from the Gulf curtailed, the price of a barrel of crude will skyrocket on the world market. Within days, the global economy will begin to grind to a halt. -------------------- "Some of you may die, but that's a sacrifice I am willing to make." -- Lord Farquaad, "Shrek" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Will Israel Start World War Three?
Will Israel Start World War Three? And finish the set-up the US started by radicalizing and arming Iran in the first place Paul Joseph Watson/Alex Jones | October 2 2005 Israeli rhetoric towards Iran has considerably heated in the last few weeks as the world hurtles towards an inevitable confrontation over Iran's nuclear programs. Last week three senior Israeli lawmakers went public to warn that Israel would act unilaterally to eliminate any perceived Iranian threat. Yosef Lapid, head of the centrist opposition Shinui Party in the Knesset stated, "Threats of sanctions and isolation alone will not do it, we feel we are obliged to warn our friends that Israel should not be pushed into a situation where we see no other solution but to act unilaterally." In 1981, Israel bombed the Osiraq nuclear power plant near Baghdad immediately prior to it being fueled by its French contractors. Once fueled, bombing is out of the question because of the radiation that would be emitted, with clouds of poison drifting anywhere across the globe. This attack was essentially the brainchild of the same Neo-Cons pulling the strings today, who were just getting a foothold during the first year of the Reagan administration. Through their actions and incessant saber-rattling they later became known as 'the crazies' by more moderate policy makers under the first Bush presidency. Even Colin Powell, an establishment underling through and through went one further, calling them "###### crazies" during the build-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The Bushehr nuclear reactor is a Russian project and it is set to be fueled very shortly. A senior Iranian atomic energy official said back in late June that the first fuel would arrive in a few months. Any targeted air strikes on the facility would merit an immediate response from the Russians. Despite reports of increasingly strained relations between Russian and Iran, Vladimir Putin has publicly stated that Russia will defend Iran both diplomatically and militarily. The implications of this are obviously deeply concerning. If the situation was to spiral out of control, China, which has recently conducted several wargames with Russia, would step in on the side of Russian and Iran. The US would be obligated to defend Israel and in turn Europe would be obligated to defend the US. Estimates of when Iran is likely to have acquired a usable nuclear arsenal range from five to ten years, but the Israelis have been fear mongering by saying it will be as soon as one or two. Israeli officials have gone on the record to warn that military exercises have already been conducted and fully rehearsed to strike Iran's nuclear facilities as soon as they go live. Lieut. General Thomas McInerney appeared on Fox News earlier this year and was asked about the likelihood of the US instigating or supporting any attack on Iran. McInerney sated, “Well, I would put one percent of using ground forces, boots on the ground in Iran, I would put up 50 percent on a blockade and I would put up fifty to sixty percent on precision air strikes on their nuclear development sites.” The history of how Iran's path to nuclear proliferation began is a familiar story. The 1953 CIA ouster of President Mossadegh, a leader who was conforming to westernized policy but made the mistake of asking to keep a small portion of his country's oil revenue, was achieved by means of staged bombings and shootings which were blamed on the Iranian government in order to antagonize the population and enable the coup. After installing the Shah Globalists like Henry Kissinger opened the door for Iran to develop sophisticated nuclear energy programs which laid the foundation for today's crisis. Twenty three reactors were built with the help of American corporations like General Electric and Westinghouse. In 1976, President Gerald Ford even authorized the Shah to buy and operate a plutonium-extracting and processing facility - a big step toward converting energy processing to weapons making. After the revolution of 1979 the fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeni reversed westernized policy but maintained Iran's nuclear interest albeit staggeringly before the end of the war with Iraq. After the war ended Iran was again free to pursue its ends leading us to the impending crisis we face today. It seems almost inevitable now that the Neo-Cons will launch targeted military strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities. Whether Israel goes alone or has US support seems beside the point. There are two dangers which apply to either outcome. 1) Will there, as George Galloway has warned could happen, be a staged terrorist attack either in Israel or the United States that is blamed on Iran? One would suspect that the scope of this attack would have to be on the level of 9/11 to warrant an immediate military operation against Iran. American Conservative magazine reported that Dick Cheney had given the authorization for a military strike on Iran immediately after the next terror attack in the United States. Former CIA officer Philip Giraldi echoed the same sentiments. 2) How will Russia and China react and will this escalation light the blue touch paper for world war three? Only time will tell. http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...ldwarthree.htm -------------------- "Some of you may die, but that's a sacrifice I am willing to make." -- Lord Farquaad, "Shrek" |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Assalam Alaikum,
Well, I believe that Iran is the priority in the long list of targets of both of these nations, and may be they will achieve their target of eliminating what they are aiming for. But the consequences of that will be very dreadful, in many scenarios. Let me ellaborate on those scenarios, if I may. Oil, Americans are dependent on Oil, like human body for food and water. Since the Oil prices are still high at the moment, therefore causing a lot of unease for Bush. Besides, America will consider the scenario of utter chaos by its actions in the middle east, and possibly to its oil supply, and may reconsider. Iraq didn't do them any good, so they have no choice but to reflect, before even thinking about another military dispute. Military, given that America has a very strong Air capacity, and with Israel they can manage to do away by striking. But its military manpower is running thin, very thin, unless Israel backs it up with its manpower in a full flash war. America, in case of big scale war, will have no choice but to start draft, which will not settle good with its public. Europe, no matter how strong ties they have will still be reluctant on any such action, France and Germany mainly. Why do I reiterate on the manpower? The reason being that, in case of conventional war, it will be a condition of do or die for Iran, and America and Israel will have no choice but move their conventional forces into Iran via Afghanistan and Iraq. Therefore, leaving Americans stark naked to be targeted by both Sunni Arabs of Iraq, and Shiites of both Iran and Iraq. Think what will North Korea do in that situation? How about Venezuela? Both of these countries are actively looking into nuclear technology. Thanks. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
In my opinion, Iraq was attacked on the joint efforts of Iran & Israel. If today the two are posing as enemies, it could be another drama staged by the think tanks of the west.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
U.s. Nuclear Policy Toward Iran | fahad269 | News & Articles | 0 | Sunday, December 23, 2007 08:15 PM |
Iran's Nuclear Program. | MUKHTIAR ALI | Current Affairs | 0 | Saturday, January 20, 2007 07:13 PM |
Iran's "Right" to a Nuclear Program | atifch | Discussion | 34 | Monday, December 25, 2006 12:08 AM |
History of Iranian Nuclear Programme | Naseer Ahmed Chandio | News & Articles | 0 | Tuesday, May 30, 2006 02:07 PM |