“KASHMIRIS have been denied their rights to determine their own future…They are neither with India nor with Pakistan” (Krishna Pokarel, The Wall Street Journal).
set down ur worthy comments......

The diversity and scacity of water in the whole of the planet rises several quieries before considering PAKISTAN nad india fighting for water which in turns an assest of kashmir. The bone of contention between the two nuclear puissance is the water issue..AT the time of birth of both the contentious states fought a war to occupy the land(kashmir ) keeping in veiw the geopolitical status of the country.BUT Pakistan enjoyed empathy of kashmiris, and the slogan was well raised THT KASHMIR BELONGS TO PAKISTAN (MUSLIM STATE).bUT as time passed the slogan seems to be well evanesce as the is only becoz of the political kashmiri leadership maleficent pratics.There is a sense of reluctance is creeping since the leadership is not interpreating the true desire of kashmiris.A stradom recently had a confabulation with the homeboys news repoters(kashmiris) reagading the fueld up indoPAK water crisis they said"the consumption of kashmir water by the indains and the pakistanis has created a severe shortness of its natuarl resource since the capital is severly deprived of elsectricity wich is considered as the basic comfort to the modern age, more over he added the usage of water internation is not to the full extent leaving the inhabitants wondering and thus creating abhorrence and detestation for both the nations .this disdain is so much worsen tht thers is a unambiguous reaction of the local kashmir and the impertinence towards the PAKISTANI authority including india too.IT is advicble to face the music on the reality bases rather thn beating about the bush.KASHMIR will turn another east pakistan , if pakistan does not addresed the desires of the kashmiris, since the aftermath of occupyinga nation bt the hearts of its loacal will automaticaly creat mutiny.One edge which pakistan will have over india is tht we can smartly change the tables by interprating kashmiris freedom raTHER thn demanding her to be part of pakistan.That will eventulay make us on the upper hand

The only effective solution to Kashmir is that both countries India and Pakistan should find an amicable solution, it will not devoid Kashmiries of their right. In my humble opinion Kashmir should be an independant state neither with Pakistan nor India, this way it will open a new linkage of trade between both countries.

Keeping in view the efforts made in 1948 by the UN and both countries, it has only aggravated the situation towards militancy and more death toll rather than reaching a desirable solution as conceived by the Kashmiries as well.

__________________
Shiraz A.K
Assistant Commissioner (IRS)

it shouldn,t be an option. but unfortunately, in the shadow of the following
aspects, it is an option to liberate it;

1)nuke parity and balance of power
2)weakening pak stance on kashmir
3)-ive role of global powers
4)weakening indian integrity
5)incapacitated pak support for mujahideen
6)low morale of indian forces in kashmir
7)indian fear of war switching from afghan to kashmir may compell india to avoid any skirmish with mujahideen. and indil may try to get rid of the territory. since weak indian interrnal situation .....

so, both india n pak cannot bond kashmir with them. ultimately, it will be an independent land.

Independant kashmir is in the interest of all the three parties India, Pakistan and the Kashmiries themselves. It would give them a chance to get out of the 60 years trauma of indian occupation and will effective start working out better. Keep in mind that Kashmir is the largest exporter of Apple in the world, its beauty can attract the world and can earn good profits from its tourism, so there are many many options open for Kashmir once it is resolved amicably.

I am positive both countries should show good faith and come forward to resolve and progress further which in turn will also give stability to our region of the world. Kashmir remain the bottle neck issue between Indo-Pak and this problem has been perplexed with religious fervour as well which has further swayed the situation away from any resolution and positive development.

__________________
Shiraz A.K
Assistant Commissioner (IRS)

There should be consensus between all three parties and I guess Kashmiris also want an independent country, and that's because they are not happy with Indo-Pak talks.

__________________
"I have an eternal bond with my people, which armies can't break" - Z. A. Bhutto

Kashmiris would decide by themselves that either they want to live with Pakistan or with India according to UN resolution agreed by three parties..independent Kasmir is out of question...but Kashmiris should have given the right to live independently...both countries e.g Pak and India should shed their stubborn atitude and let the Kashmiris decide to choose their Path..but it will remain a dream
Regards

__________________
Fight for your dreams & your dreams will fight for you.

I think Kashmir should be independent because it is the only rational solution.The inflexibility of both Pakistan and India regarding Kashmir is obvious so there is no other option for peace but to make it independent.It is the major bone of contention between the two countries.

__________________
Love is my Shield,Truth is my Sword,Brain is my Crown,Smile is my Treasure and I'm a Queen;
Quitters never win and Winners never quit..!!!

I don't think independent Kashmir is a realistic scenario bcaz the animosity between India and Pakistan over Kashmir issue is open to all.They ll not let this happen due to their strategic interests and also due to mistrust prevailing in their minds.moreover i dont think that they can ever come on a joint solution and mechanism over independent Kashmir.so Kashmiris should be given choice according to UN resolutions.

__________________
By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.
Confucius