Originally Posted by ThaHawk

but it is not possible for a man to become a dictator and then not be lost in the sweetness of power

Originally Posted by islah_G

we dont need dictator like Musharraf zia and ayub, we need like Hitler Mussolini.
I am pointing a man from Army becoz he will have that much power to control the things.
There is no man in sight in the whole country who will do so in the present circumstances but a General. That General ll need a short group of policy makers/ministers who ll perform all the work of the country. Only in such a case Pakistan will emerge like One nation not a Nation of nationalities.

Originally Posted by ThaHawk

but brother not all great generals receive formal army training, look at prophet Muhammad he received no training for army neither did Hazrat umar etc .. and the problem will never be solved as long as we have 1 human being having all the authority and no checks and balances in dictatorship its one man show brother, one man is all in all he can do anything and no one can stop him

Originally Posted by islah_G

The only way out is a BLOODY REVOLUTION, in which we see kicking out these corrupt and selfish politicians from the country and punishing them public-ally, capturing their properties and distributing it in the poor people,
This can be done only through ARMY.

Originally Posted by islah_G

Do not compare the present time with the time of prophet and todays people with Prophets and Caliphs plz.
Well one man show is very much necessary for pakistan in the present time, we don't like hundreds of Ministers and thousands of MPs who are almost 100 percent corrupt , don't u observe the same old wine in new bottles for years in this country? do u think the way our politics our democracy is going will bring prosperity and development for this country, not at all my dear, we need a man like Hitler, like Mussolini like khumainee . who can perform One man show.

Originally Posted by Saleeqa Batool

There is no denying of the fact that the prevailing system has put the country in to morass we are confronting today and there seems no room for optimism ,if status quo persists.In this backdrop , there is, again, a call for change but not of system but of Govt.Those advocating this change include former Genral Hameed Gul, a section of media and some retired bureaucrats.Their call has attracted reasonable support from public. The modus operendi they have suggested calls Army to intervene to farm a National Govt and implement decisions of Supreme Court.

However things are not as simple as presented. Any intervention from the army on any of the pretext will eventually lead to absolute military rule so any call for military intervention will lead to Military Rule.

But whether the military again coming to take direct charge of governance will lead the situation towards betterment is something not corroborated by the past experience.I believe Military intervention will worsen the condition instead of turning it in to better for many a reasons.

So if not Military then who will bring change? This can be answered by first looking into the major problems the country is riddled with.Broadly they can be divided in to following categories.

1-Security(Terrorism, External Security, Baluchistan Insurgency)
2-Economic(Poverty, Inflation, Energy Crises, Unemployment)
3-Social(Extremism, Intolerance, Moral Deprivity )
4-Governance(Corruption, Inefficiency,Law and Order )
5-Political (Anti Federation Sentiments , Instability)
6-International (Pak-US Relations, Pakistan's Image in world comity)

These problems enumerated above are not mutually exclusive and exhaustive rather they are linked inter se.

Any proposed change must be effective enough to address these issues. Those who are inviting Army fail to view the situation in broad spectrum or they have their own agenda. First , the circumstances our military is going though prevent it from holding the charge and there seems no effort on the part of Military to make effort for coup.Secondly , the international community will vehemently oppose any unconstitutional change in Pakistan. Thirdly in common perception Military leadership can bring economic turnaround and deliver on governance front.Though both the points are open to debate , yet if the accepted , Army rulers have little capability to solve other problems especially political ones.So in given circumstances , any Military intervention will further exacerbate the morass.

Then what should be the way of change? In my opinion , we have a chance to change the entire system. If in upcoming elections , the entire nation set itself to instigate a change, no force can stop it.What we need to do is only vote not on the basis of personal interests, clans and bradrism , influence etc but on the call of one's conscious.Just vote to the right person.

Currently the ruling class perceive itself to be the unopposed and unchallenged owner of political system. This perception prevent them working in the interest of public and pay heed to public woes. What they are striving for , is protect their position under these myths through sale and purchase of loyalties. They play the political games in drawing rooms and by winning the heavy wieghts to their sides.If the nation prove that no one is heavy weight other than on the basis of ones will to serve , the scansion will change altogether.

If you Change Zardari , Gilani some one else will replace them but the forces holding clout at the helm of affairs will remain there. You can kick them out of Presidency , PM house but stop hundereds of people like them including Qureshis, Khars, Makhdooms, Cahudries, Jatois, Khosas, Sardars etc making place in the corridors of power.

What we need then is en mass rejection of existing lot. Chose new people and make them believe that no other consideration but their performance will entitle them for our vote again. This change of attitude is the only way to change the system.