|
Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only. |
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Obama Re-elected, influence on Pakistan
As we know that Obama has been elected and I think now his attitude toward Pakistan would be more strict and drone attacks would increase because election is over and he has much time to play now. please give your views.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to oxon For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012), MAIMOONA RASHID (Wednesday, November 28, 2012), waqas naseer (Wednesday, November 28, 2012) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Stay Blessed Regards
__________________
You can complain that roses have thorns but you can rejoice that thorns have roses. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Muhammad iqbal Serwar For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012), oxon (Thursday, November 08, 2012) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
congratulations to obama on a side and what i suggest that now is the time to decide ourselves and not let the americans to write our fate otherwise now electoral drama has been over and obama government ll certainly take us and ll pressurize us to turn the military jaws toward safe part of waziristan .......ball is in the court of ppp whether to go for obama's policy or to oppose those for better PAKISTAN we have to wait for the time
Last edited by Arain007; Thursday, November 08, 2012 at 06:20 PM. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to headache For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012), oxon (Thursday, November 08, 2012) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Obama and Pakistan.
AS a country that has been the focus of world attention for reasons more than one, Pakistan will watch with hope and concern how the foreign policy of President Barack Obama during his second term will affect it in the years to come. Will the new Obama administration reassess some controversial aspects of its foreign policy, like the unceasing drone attacks in the northwest, or will the new mandate serve to reinforce its belief in the righteousness of its policies and stay the course? Since 2008, the US-Pakistan relationship has gone through unprecedented turmoil. Three events last year aggravated tensions between the two — the Raymond Davis affair, the American commando raid that killed Osama bin Laden and the death of 24 Pakistani soldiers at Salala in a US-led Nato attack. In anger, Pakistan boycotted the Bonn conference and suspended the Nato supply line, insisting on an apology. The damage-control exercise took nearly a year to succeed; but it still remains to be seen to what extent the frosty rapprochement can remove the mistrust. The task before the two governments now is to strengthen bilateral ties and cooperate to achieve common objectives.
The obvious goal is to give peace and stability to Afghanistan during and after the Nato forces’ withdrawal by the end of 2014. There are some harsh realities: the Afghan Taliban have not been defeated; the peace talks stand frozen, or if at all there has been progress, America has kept its cards close to its chest; and the beleaguered Karzai regime seems to be in no position to maintain security after 2014. It is here — and not because of the 100 nuclear warheads Mitt Romney spoke of — that America needs Pakistan. Given the bonds of history, culture, economy and geography that unite Pakistan and Afghanistan, the transition to a long-lasting peace west of the Durand Line would not be possible without engaging Islamabad and addressing its legitimate concerns. More important, it is in Washington’s interest to de-velop a long-term relationship with Islamabad instead of ‘returning’ to Pakistan only when a crisis beckons. As for its policy towards the Muslim heartland, President Obama should re-read his Cairo speech and judge whether America under him has achieved any of its goals. Iran continues to be under harsh American sanctions, and Israel builds settlements in utter disregard of President Obama’s warnings, toothless as they have been. His commitment to the two-state solution has become academic, because Israel has blocked the peace process, and Washington is at the Likud government’s beck and call to deny state status to Palestine at the UN. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Nasima For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012), oxon (Thursday, November 08, 2012), roshni12 (Friday, November 09, 2012), sidra siyal (Thursday, November 08, 2012) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
yes i agree Obama,s attitude towards Pakistan would be more strict after re-election
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hinanazir For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Obama's (re)election will hardly make any difference. In fact, in USA every affair of international importance is managed by the congress. President,realistically speaking, is only the nominal head. More importantly, the influence of Jewish lobby is so great that it will never let the president(s) to work according to his sweet will. Its the congress ,unlike Pakistani parliament, which is all powerful,not the President.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to nisha cute For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012), nbangash (Monday, November 12, 2012), oxon (Saturday, November 10, 2012) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
As far as my thinking is concerned, He and his supporters will try to start their same motive in Pakistan as they are doing in Afghanistan since 2000 till date.They'll reach North Waziristan and will move slowly slowly to South Waziristan afterwards.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Neo[t] For This Useful Post: | ||
oxon (Saturday, November 10, 2012) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness. |
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Xeric For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012), anam047 (Sunday, November 11, 2012), cordialswap (Monday, November 12, 2012), darwaish (Saturday, November 10, 2012), EXCLUSIVE (Saturday, November 10, 2012), Muhammad iqbal Serwar (Saturday, November 10, 2012), Muhammad T S Awan (Saturday, November 10, 2012), Nasima (Monday, November 12, 2012), nbangash (Monday, November 12, 2012), oxon (Wednesday, November 28, 2012), Shikva (Monday, November 12, 2012) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think any such thing is going to happen. I am so happy that he has been re-elected because he is thousand times better for us than a Republican.
__________________
Sangdil Riwajoon ki ya Imart-e-Kohna Toot bhi Tou Skti hay Yeh Aseer Sehzadi Choot bhi tou Skti hay |
The Following User Says Thank You to Call for Change For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
you are pointing towards drone policy .our parliament played so much .Drone attacks needs consensus because pak -us relations is necessity and if impeded then we have to face draw backs. Qandahar has now becoming global base for drone attacks.In future ,drones will continue unless presented in ICJ or have unanimous consensus .If not ,then terrorism will shatter our diplomatic relations with regional powers.
__________________
"Wa tu izzu man-ta shaa, wa tu zillu man-ta shaa" |
The Following User Says Thank You to SADIA SHAFIQ For This Useful Post: | ||
alihashmatkhoso (Wednesday, November 28, 2012) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pak-Affairs Notes | Predator | Pakistan Affairs | 68 | Friday, December 23, 2022 07:27 PM |
Current Affairs | Sureshlasi | Current Affairs | 60 | Tuesday, May 12, 2020 01:45 PM |
Important C.A topics for CE 2011..! | Maha Khan | Current Affairs | 1 | Sunday, January 30, 2011 09:56 AM |
The search for peace - pakistan and india | Tassawur | Pakistan Affairs | 0 | Tuesday, January 04, 2011 11:49 AM |
indo-pak relations | atifch | Current Affairs | 0 | Monday, December 11, 2006 09:01 PM |