As we know that Obama has been elected and I think now his attitude toward Pakistan would be more strict and drone attacks would increase because election is over and he has much time to play now. please give your views.

Yes, it seems that he is going to peruse the same strategy. It may be more stick with the passage of the time.Now, they will increase pressure to launch an operation in south wazirstan. It is the Pakistani authorities how do they tackle the situations specifically after the 2014. It does not seem an endgame but it would be the beginning of a new Pandora box. That will increase the problems of the pakistan

Stay Blessed

Regards

__________________
You can complain that roses have thorns but you can rejoice that thorns have roses.

congratulations to obama on a side and what i suggest that now is the time to decide ourselves and not let the americans to write our fate otherwise now electoral drama has been over and obama government ll certainly take us and ll pressurize us to turn the military jaws toward safe part of waziristan .......ball is in the court of ppp whether to go for obama's policy or to oppose those for better PAKISTAN we have to wait for the time

AS a country that has been the focus of world attention for reasons more than one, Pakistan will watch with hope and concern how the foreign policy of President Barack Obama during his second term will affect it in the years to come. Will the new Obama administration reassess some controversial aspects of its foreign policy, like the unceasing drone attacks in the northwest, or will the new mandate serve to reinforce its belief in the righteousness of its policies and stay the course? Since 2008, the US-Pakistan relationship has gone through unprecedented turmoil. Three events last year aggravated tensions between the two — the Raymond Davis affair, the American commando raid that killed Osama bin Laden and the death of 24 Pakistani soldiers at Salala in a US-led Nato attack. In anger, Pakistan boycotted the Bonn conference and suspended the Nato supply line, insisting on an apology. The damage-control exercise took nearly a year to succeed; but it still remains to be seen to what extent the frosty rapprochement can remove the mistrust. The task before the two governments now is to strengthen bilateral ties and cooperate to achieve common objectives.
The obvious goal is to give peace and stability to Afghanistan during and after the Nato forces’ withdrawal by the end of 2014. There are some harsh realities: the Afghan Taliban have not been defeated; the peace talks stand frozen, or if at all there has been progress, America has kept its cards close to its chest; and the beleaguered Karzai regime seems to be in no position to maintain security after 2014. It is here — and not because of the 100 nuclear warheads Mitt Romney spoke of — that America needs Pakistan. Given the bonds of history, culture, economy and geography that unite Pakistan and Afghanistan, the transition to a long-lasting peace west of the Durand Line would not be possible without engaging Islamabad and addressing its legitimate concerns. More important, it is in Washington’s interest to de-velop a long-term relationship with Islamabad instead of ‘returning’ to Pakistan only when a crisis beckons.
As for its policy towards the Muslim heartland, President Obama should re-read his Cairo speech and judge whether America under him has achieved any of its goals. Iran continues to be under harsh American sanctions, and Israel builds settlements in utter disregard of President Obama’s warnings, toothless as they have been. His commitment to the two-state solution has become academic, because Israel has blocked the peace process, and Washington is at the Likud government’s beck and call to deny state status to Palestine at the UN.

yes i agree Obama,s attitude towards Pakistan would be more strict after re-election

Obama's (re)election will hardly make any difference. In fact, in USA every affair of international importance is managed by the congress. President,realistically speaking, is only the nominal head. More importantly, the influence of Jewish lobby is so great that it will never let the president(s) to work according to his sweet will. Its the congress ,unlike Pakistani parliament, which is all powerful,not the President.

As far as my thinking is concerned, He and his supporters will try to start their same motive in Pakistan as they are doing in Afghanistan since 2000 till date.They'll reach North Waziristan and will move slowly slowly to South Waziristan afterwards.

Dear Ms. Nasima when you share someone's work then please do share the link and give due credit to the author. http://dawn.com/2012/11/08/obama-pakistan/

__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness.

I don't think any such thing is going to happen. I am so happy that he has been re-elected because he is thousand times better for us than a Republican.

__________________
Sangdil Riwajoon ki ya Imart-e-Kohna Toot bhi Tou Skti hay
Yeh Aseer Sehzadi Choot bhi tou Skti hay

you are pointing towards drone policy .our parliament played so much .Drone attacks needs consensus because pak -us relations is necessity and if impeded then we have to face draw backs. Qandahar has now becoming global base for drone attacks.In future ,drones will continue unless presented in ICJ or have unanimous consensus .If not ,then terrorism will shatter our diplomatic relations with regional powers.

__________________
"Wa tu izzu man-ta shaa, wa tu zillu man-ta shaa"