Saturday, May 18, 2024
05:19 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > Discussion

Discussion Discuss current affairs and issues helpful in CSS only.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Thursday, August 29, 2013
Bostan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In land of opportunities
Posts: 125
Thanks: 54
Thanked 47 Times in 28 Posts
Bostan is on a distinguished road
Question New Policy Note for P.M by W.B

A new policy note given by World bank to the P.M in which mentioned that
1 make MFN to India
2 make agreements to get electricity by India
is this not like to make Pakistan totly disable and handicapped country?
and at the same time India start aggression and blame game on LOC also
should we accept the offers by India or not? what's the results?
what's your pernicious remarks about this members and seniors?


World Bank asks Pakistan to give MFN status to India


ISLAMABAD: In its detailed “Policy Notes” for the Nawaz Sharif government, issued in the midst of mounting tension between Islamabad and New Delhi, the World Bank has asked Pakistan to give India the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status.

The WB also wants the two countries to sign power transmission and trade agreements.The 293-page WB document — Pakistan the Transformative Path — presents a possible list of the 12 most urgent transformational reforms required to be taken by the Nawaz Sharif government and include the MFN status for India, the import of electricity from India, etc.

On August 20, the WB announced that it had put together a Country Economic Memorandum and 16 sector-specific Policy Notes for the Nawaz Sharif government with a series of policy choices.

Ignoring the tensions as well as the complexities of the irritants, including India’s water offensive and the issue of Kashmir between the two countries, the World Bank suggested to Islamabad: “Completing the trade normalisation process with India and granting it the MFN status would help Pakistan benefit quickly from the fast growth and large markets.”

“Conservative estimates suggest that bilateral trade flows could multiply at least three times, and most observers agree that the growth-enhancing dynamics that this process would unleash would be even more significant for foreign direct investment (especially information technology and manufacturing), services (including financial and tourism), integrated value chains in manufacturing, and power projects.”

While not many including those in the power corridors know how much possible is the import of electricity from India, the WB document even talks of a possible timeline for the implementation of this project that is feared to have an extremely negative impact on Pakistan’s water rights. The WB document says, “A power transmission link with India, under a power tariff arrangement benefiting both countries, could be implemented in the next 6–12 months with a potential capacity of 1,000 megawatts.”

Pakistan, whose soldiers are being targeted by the Indian Army on the LoC every second day for the last few weeks, is allured by the WB, “Fully normalizing trade relations with India, including opening the border, will facilitate deep forms of trade integration. The measures are necessary to benefit from India’s fast growth and to promote complementarities, including value-chain activities and investment potential.”

It added: “Our calculations using a gravity equation suggest that exports to India are 40 percent below their predicted potential. Similarly, Pakistan is the key missing market for India, underlining that both countries would gain greatly by normalizing their trade relations. These moves should aim at deep forms of trade integration and not be limited to market access. Given that trade is only now starting to be normalized, the focus should be on expediting measures to facilitate trade, building on the recently signed agreements on mutual recognition and visas, and improving infrastructure, institutions, services, policies, procedures, and market-oriented regulatory systems.”

The WB Policy Notes for the Sharif government also outline the following two specific measures for further assessment, potentially on a joint basis with India: a) Removing impediments at the border, especially Wagah-Attari, and along trade routes. A one-stop border post at Wagah-Attari would have a large demonstration effect, as would inland container depots on either side of the border. There is also potential for transit agreements to link Pakistan to Bangladesh and to Nepal, and India to Afghanistan (similar to the one negotiated between Pakistan and Afghanistan); for associated infrastructure supporting new trade routes; and for online payment systems. B) Further integrating border communities. Populations along the border regions are among the poorest in both Pakistan and India, and so integrating their communities presents particular challenges. More localized initiatives to target them, including border bazaars and other measures to encourage cross-border trade, are yet to be fully explored. Some initiatives along these lines are already in place between Bangladesh and India.

Source
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Thursday, August 29, 2013
Anønymøus's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Anonymous
Posts: 72
Thanks: 3
Thanked 33 Times in 24 Posts
Anønymøus is on a distinguished road
Cool Policy Notes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shooting Star View Post
Thanks for your assistance
Apart from this news source you can directly download "Policy Notes to Pakistan" in PDF from this World Bank website link,Policy Notes for Pakistan, you will find all above facts overthere. Further please avoid practice of saying thanks in posts in V bulletin forums like this.
__________________
Keep Calm & Expect Us
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Thursday, August 29, 2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 339
Thanks: 41
Thanked 171 Times in 119 Posts
tajmeer will become famous soon enough
Default

India is the second largest populous country of the world and World Bank wants us to import electricity from them so it means they are producing enough electricity for the their nation and we can assume from it that our leadership is failed in front of Indian leadership. Both these countries got independence from British rule together but India successfully going to their path and achieving their targets. Although corruption,mismanagement and bad governance is also as same their in India then why they are going so fast and developing their nation. Our leadership have no vision no plan no strategy to solve these problems. As there are many resources through which we can produce electricity enough for our country. Pakistan is a nuclear country but still we beg from other nations.
__________________
“You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Thursday, August 29, 2013
Bostan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: In land of opportunities
Posts: 125
Thanks: 54
Thanked 47 Times in 28 Posts
Bostan is on a distinguished road
Default

thanx for this but actually question aroused by me mentioned in posted need comments on that questions
what should the Govt do in this regard
shall we accept all terms of this policy note by World bank?
if we accept then what will be the outcomes nd effects on Pakistan?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Friday, August 30, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: jhelum
Posts: 46
Thanks: 23
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
tazimchaudhary is on a distinguished road
Default

Most favorite cannot be at war each other .by just giving the title of MFN to India could not change the reality of hostility between two nations.Further more having the trade with India is not bad thing, Example of china is before us. in spite of hostility China have trade relationships with India, USA, and Taiwan. in fact USA is the one of the world largest importer of Chinese products since after recession. Our government and people at the helm of affairs should think rationally. While importing Electricity from India does not mean that we stop to improve our indigenous sources.Cost and benefit analysis must be conducted to take any such step.
__________________
Main ny sirf ALLAH py yakeen kia , aur baqi sab yakeen us k sath jurty chaly gy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Saturday, August 31, 2013
aniqa hashmi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: in my world
Posts: 105
Thanks: 50
Thanked 48 Times in 37 Posts
aniqa hashmi is on a distinguished road
Default

giving MFN status to india will not be in favor of Sharif Govt because all of us know relation between both countries, pakistani people will not accept this, moreover india is taking "our" water and now we are asked to take electricity from him.....how ridiculous!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I Need Mcqs for Economics Beauty Economics 24 Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:20 AM
A meaningless monetary policy VetDoctor The News 0 Sunday, June 23, 2013 02:11 PM
Foreign Policy of America History sara soomro Current Affairs 0 Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:49 PM
Educational Policy Of Pakistan 1998 To 2010 The Star Pakistan Affairs 0 Thursday, April 02, 2009 02:16 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.