Saturday, May 04, 2024
02:18 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles

News & Articles Here you can share News and Articles that you consider important for the exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Islamabad the beautiful.A dream city indeed
Posts: 828
Thanks: 323
Thanked 332 Times in 223 Posts
niazikhan2 has a spectacular aura aboutniazikhan2 has a spectacular aura about
Exclamation The double game of Washington

ISLAMABAD: While Washington is eager to strike a peace deal with rapidly dominating Taliban in Afghanistan, it is pressing Islamabad to launch a major military offensive against Pak-friendly Taliban in North Waziristan, an action that will multiply the horrors of already reeling Pakistan.
The Pakistan Army has been resisting Washington’s pressure to launch a military operation in North Waziristan primarily to target the pro-Pakistan Haqqani group. However, the latest media reports suggest that a decision has been taken in this respect. If true, it is a serious cause of concern for Pakistan.
Military authorities have yet to confirm the report, which said a decision had been taken to launch the military offensive in North Waziristan, the tribal area adjacent to Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan.
Pakistan Tehrik-e-Insaaf chief Imran Khan sounded quite disappointed with this reported decision and feared that if the military operation was launched, it would have dangerous implications for Pakistan. Talking to this correspondent, he said that distancing from the US war on terror was the key to bring back peace within Pakistan or he has already warned that this war may create a serious rift within the Pakistan Army.
Interestingly, while the Taliban leadership in Afghanistan is not interested in any rapprochement with the US and Nato forces and is instead struggling to push the foreign forces out of the Afghan soil, Washington is not allowing Pakistan to talk peace with the local Taliban, whose focus of attack is Pakistan Army, intelligence agencies, security and military installations, police, other law enforcing agencies and some selected civilian targets.
Top military commanders have been sharing with media-men, in recent background interactions, their reluctance to launch military operations in the NWA on the desires of Washington. These military commanders have been sharing the view that such an action would mean making more enemies for Pakistan.
Instead of understanding the pains of Pakistan and allowing it to overcome terrorism through negotiated solution to become stable enough to address the concerns of the international community, the US continues with its drone attacks in the tribal areas, a move that massively contributes towards furthering terrorist attacks inside Pakistan.
Here everyone knows that the apparent target of the US drones is those Taliban leaders and fighters, who take part in Jihad against the US and Nato forces inside Afghanistan, whereas those earmarked as “bad Taliban” for Pakistan are spared and never targeted despite repeated requests to the US in the past.
Former corps commanders, Peshawar, Lt Gen Safdar, and Lt Gen Ali Jan Orakzai (both now retired) during their tenures had entered into peace deals with the Taliban leaders but every time the US drones sabotaged these deals and in return multiplied Pakistan’s problems.
Parliament, in its Oct 2008 resolution, sought for a negotiated solution to the problem of terrorism and extremism. However, no serious talks were initiated with the Pakistani Taliban, including the TTP.
On the contrary, a few more military operations were launched. Coupled with the drone attacks, these military operations fueled extremism and furthered terrorist attacks. Pakistani security officials though still claim that they can negotiate a peace deal with the local Taliban, there exists a serious mistrust between the two sides.
Even some respected and influential go-betweens have not much faith in the government to help strike a peace deal. Sheikhul Hadith Akora Khttak Dr Sher Ali is one respected name, who reportedly could talk to the TTP leaders and its chief Hakeemullah Mahsud. A few other respected names including that of Justice Taqi Usmani and Mufti Muhammad Naeem are also believed to be in the same category.
One of these revered religious scholars has helped the authorities in the past to talk to local Taliban and had even secured the release of Chinese engineers. Sources said that these religious scholars could play a vital role for a peace deal between the Pakistani authorities and Taliban groups, particularly the most influential TTP, but such an initiative requires the implementation of the parliamentary resolutions and solid commitment of the authorities that they would stand by their word.



The double game of Washington
__________________
Every Heart Sings a Song,Incomplete until another Heart Whisper it Back-Plato
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G.K objectives for all terminator Topics and Notes 18 Friday, January 21, 2022 01:35 AM
Quotations. MoonAli Humorous, Inspirational and General Stuff 1197 Thursday, November 11, 2021 06:02 PM
In House Politics, Horse Trading or Number Game??? Naeny Khan News & Articles 0 Wednesday, January 05, 2011 11:34 PM
Democracy - Ultimate political strategy game! mihir References and Recommendations 0 Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:50 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.