Tuesday, May 21, 2024
11:50 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles

News & Articles Here you can share News and Articles that you consider important for the exam

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Friday, June 10, 2011
redmax's Avatar
40th CTP (DMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 73Diligent Service Medal: Awarded upon completion of 5 years of dedicated services and contribution to the community. - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Inaccessible
Posts: 1,012
Thanks: 1,335
Thanked 2,480 Times in 622 Posts
redmax has much to be proud ofredmax has much to be proud ofredmax has much to be proud ofredmax has much to be proud ofredmax has much to be proud ofredmax has much to be proud ofredmax has much to be proud ofredmax has much to be proud of
Post Pakistan Army will NOT carry out an operation in North Waziristan

ISLAMABAD: On the surface of it the 139th Corps Commanders Conference appeared to be different from its predecessors in that it provided the military’s viewpoint on a number of recent controversies.

A lengthy press release issued by the ISPR went so far as to provide a rare insight into the broad contours of ‘renegotiated terms of engagement’ with the Americans.

“The participants noted with regret that despite briefing the joint session of the Parliament and deferring the ultimate findings to the commission appointed by the government, some quarters, because of their perceptual biases, were trying to deliberately run down the Armed Forces, and the Army in particular,” the statement said.

It cautioned that the campaign against the army would be seen as an attempt to “drive a wedge” between the military, organs of the state and the nation. “Nothing should distract them (the troops) from the job at hand (fighting terrorism).”

The twenty-odd commanders led by their chief Gen Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, who till recently was credited with having bolstered the army’s image after his predecessor Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf’s departure, sent out a clear message: “All of us should take cognizance of this unfortunate trend (of slandering the army) and put an end to it.”

Another recent controversy that the press release addressed was that of the billions of dollars in US military aid. Figures were quoted to prove that the armed forces did not get the bulk of the amount reimbursed by Washington for the expenses incurred for fighting the US-led war against militancy.

“Under the head of Coalition Support Fund (CSF), against a total sum of $13 billion expected from the US, only $8.6 billion have been received by the Government of Pakistan. The government has further made available only $1.4 billion to the Army over last ten years. A relatively smaller amount has gone to Navy and PAF as well.

“The rest, ie approximately $6 billion, have been utilised by the Government of Pakistan for budgetary support, which ultimately means the people of Pakistan.”

The military, according to Reuters, also repeated its opposition to missile strike by US drones, saying “these are not acceptable under any circumstances”.

The army chief also touched on the impending North Waziristan operation, which the US has been pressuring for, saying he would accept no external pressure on its timing.

“The army was following a well thought-out campaign plan and is under no pressure to carry out operations at a particular time. Future operations, as and when undertaken, will be with political consensus.”

But the statement hinted at a possible change of tactics for dealing with the North Waziristan problem. With Gen Kayani calling on tribesmen to evict foreigners, it appeared that he wanted to utilise the services of loyal tribes to force the foreigners out instead of pitting the army against the militants.

The COAS reiterated the principle of no-tolerance for terrorism: “It was wrong, in principle, to allow others to use our land for fighting their battles. This must not be allowed. Army in North Waziristan is committed to supporting the people of NWA in this effort.”

INTELLIGENCE SHARING: The statement set clear limits on intelligence-sharing with the United States.

“It has been decided to share intelligence strictly on the basis of reciprocity and complete transparency,” it said.

“It has been clearly put across to US intelligence officials that no intelligence agency can be allowed to carry out independent operation on our soil.”

The commanders sought to distance themselves from the domestic political situation as well as dispel the impression that they were backing the PPP-led government.

“The army leadership reaffirmed its resolve to continue supporting the democratic system without any preference to any particular political party.”

However, the commanders also used the opportunity to voice their complaints. The press release spoke of the ‘insufficient support’ the army was getting from civilian law enforcement agencies.

“LEAs … need to be more focussed and proactive and Army will be there to extend all possible support.”

Gen Kayani has in the past indicated that the military was increasingly becoming impatient with the LEAs performance.

Perhaps what was most noteworthy was the public announcement about the ‘renegotiated terms of engagement’ with the US after the May 2 raid. Unusually, the military took pains to explain what it had sought from the Americans, even though it is evident that only those facets were revealed that projected a positive image of the army.

While it has been reported without any concrete evidence that US had been asked to reduce its military footprint in Pakistan, Gen Kayani was quoted in the press release as having told his commanders that all military training of Pakistani troops by the Americans had ceased.

The US had been training Pakistani troops for some of the recently acquired weaponry, besides building the capacity of the Frontier Corps.

The general also clarified the ‘new limits’ for intelligence sharing with the US.

“It has been decided to share intelligence strictly on the basis of reciprocity and complete transparency. It has been clearly put across to US intelligence officials that no intelligence agency can be allowed to carry out independent operation on our soil,” Gen Kayani was quoted by ISPR.

Gen Kayani, who like his predecessor has earned the reputation of being pro-West, has recently made a conscious effort to present a more independent and nationalist image to his army and to the public at large.



[Source: www.dawn.com]
__________________
Verily, His command, when He intends a thing, is only that He says "Be!" - and it is! (Al-Quran)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redmax For This Useful Post:
Perhar (Saturday, June 11, 2011)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The failure of Pakistan to develop a political system, Miss_Naqvi Pakistan Affairs 7 Tuesday, October 20, 2020 07:42 PM
development of pakistan press since 1947 Janeeta Journalism & Mass Communication 15 Tuesday, May 05, 2020 03:04 AM
Pak Affair Notes Asif Yousufzai Pakistan Affairs 28 Tuesday, January 01, 2013 07:11 PM
Pakistan-united states relations veering towards a breakdown Shooting Star Current Affairs 0 Thursday, March 24, 2011 07:56 PM
Facts About Pakistan riversoul76 Pakistan Affairs 1 Friday, November 24, 2006 06:23 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.