Thursday, May 16, 2024
04:25 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles > The Express Tribune

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Tuesday, May 14, 2013
HASEEB ANSARI's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 2,803
Thanks: 93
Thanked 1,321 Times in 834 Posts
HASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of lightHASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of lightHASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of lightHASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of lightHASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of light
Default A different Naya Pakistan

A different Naya Pakistan
By Yaqoob Khan Bangash

Last week, I compared the 2013 elections with the 1970 elections, in terms of expected turnout and significance, and the comparison had held fast. The turnout on May 11 was over 60 per cent, nearly the same as in 1970, and the eagerness, excitement and hope people voted with exemplified the importance of this election for them.
However, while in 1970, people voted for “change” both in East and West Pakistan, this time round, people did not do so, and this is a very interesting development. Almost every Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) worker I met over the last few weeks was adamant that they will win over 100 seats, and the leaders, too, were equally sure that their mass mobilisation efforts will bear fruit. But this was not to be. Instead, the cold analysis of veteran commentators that the PTI will only win 30-odd seats has come true. Why? While the exact analysis of voter turnout, perception and trends will take weeks to come out, some preliminary comments can certainly be made. First, whereas people in Pakistan were indeed tired of the previous government on various counts, the exasperation was not so much as to bring about a revolutionary change. Pakistan might have been ill-governed, but some policies of the outgoing government did help certain classes of people, and the Benazir Income Support Programme will remain one of the hallmarks of the outgoing government. Secondly, Pakistanis were frustrated, but also cynical. Without clear policies (the PTI had good ideas, but no clear policies on how to achieve those ideas), their appeal to the electorate was always limited. I met several people at the polls who changed their mind at the last minute because even though they “liked” the ideas of the PTI, they did not know “how” the PTI was going achieve those lofty goals. Thirdly, the PTI failed to realise that there are youth beyond the urban middle classes. As one friend of mine stated: “Pakistan is not one big upper middle-class drawing room. If it (the PTI) chooses to learn from this, then I assure you that change is inevitable.”
This comment reminds me of a comment someone made about the Left, which I often quote: “That you need to afford it to be Left.” This self-explanatory comment also explains the appeal of the PTI, which was comfortable for the middle classes to accept and follow, but for people who are planning their day-to-day survival, grand hopes of change only go so far. Fourthly, it shows that despite the whole PTI campaign, and large parts of the PPP campaign, against Nawaz Sharif, the Nawaz wing of the PML still remains a very popular party. Just this fact should make us stop and think.
There are lots of reasons why the PML-N won, and I hope some academic analysis of the polls further delves into them soon, but let me highlight a couple of them. First and foremost, Nawaz Sharif is pragmatic. This is, in my opinion, his greatest strength and weakness. Strength because he can assess the situation and take decisions accordingly, and weakness because people are not always sure what he is really thinking. Take the example of the Taliban: I am sure that Nawaz is not going to let them grow and take over, but am unsure about how he would deal with them. Secondly, Nawaz is going to be good for the business community. Being a businessman himself, he clearly knows, in the words of Bill Clinton, “It’s the economy, stupid!” So, if he focuses on the economy with a good team of party specialists as well as, and this is important, independent technocrats, things might turn around. His statement on good relations with India, especially with regard to trade, are certainly good omens. And thirdly, Nawaz is centre-right. While I might not prescribe to this title, the reality in the country is that a large majority of the country is conservative and cannot be ignored. The recent British Council poll of young Pakistanis also showed that a large majority of the country is deeply conservative, and so this factor cannot be dismissed. It might be counter-intuitive, but I think that we really need to give expression to this conservative majority if Pakistan is to move forward. This conservatism tempered by pragmatism and with a focus on the economy is the panacea Pakistan needs. Congratulations and good luck Nawaz Sharif, you will need it!

Published in The Express Tribune, May 14th, 2013.
__________________
"Nay! man is evidence against himself. Though he puts forth his excuses." Holy Qur'an (75:14-15)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Current Affairs Sureshlasi Current Affairs 60 Tuesday, May 12, 2020 01:45 PM
Useful for Geography 2 paper imran memon Geography 0 Monday, May 21, 2012 03:50 PM
Pakistan Relations and forign policy khuhro Current Affairs Notes 0 Sunday, August 22, 2010 09:10 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.