Saturday, April 27, 2024
03:56 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > General > News & Articles > The Express Tribune

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, February 16, 2014
HASEEB ANSARI's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 2,803
Thanks: 93
Thanked 1,321 Times in 834 Posts
HASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of lightHASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of lightHASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of lightHASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of lightHASEEB ANSARI is a glorious beacon of light
Default History plays its own games

History plays its own games
By Hussain Nadim


“The Empire, long divided, must unite: long united, must divide.”

The classical quote from the novel Romance of the Three Kingdoms by Luo Guanzhong captures the dynastic cycle: the fall of Han Dynasty, the partition of the empire into three kingdoms, and the eventual reunification of the empire under the Jin dynasty.

If anything is to be learned from history, the quote may also shed light on the geographical trajectory of South Asia: from unity to Partition in 1947, and perhaps, a reunification in decades to come. This doesn’t necessarily mean that India and Pakistan will collapse as nation-states. They won’t. However, both are likely to cease to exist in their current geographical form. After all, it’s the people that make nations, not the other way around.

The glorification of nationhood has narrowed our vision and diminished the ability to look at nation-states holistically as products of historical shifts. The status quo following Partition appears to be permanent, not underscoring that in the 4,000-year-old history of the Indo-Pak region, couple of decades account to only a fleeting ‘moment’ for Pakistan and India.

The rigid ones would tell you that ‘this is it’ — the current geography of the two countries is not only permanent — but also an absolute necessity for the survival of the two. However, a little look into history reveals that the 1947 Partition is not the only the partition that this region witnessed. Just take, for instance, Punjab. This province alone has undergone several boundary shifts in recent history. Under Ranjit Singh, it stretched from Kashmir to modern Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, later reduced to pre-Partition Punjab under the British Empire and eventually divided into Indian Punjab and Pakistani Punjab post-Partition. And let’s not forget East Pakistan’s (now Bangladesh) separation from Pakistan in 1971. Perhaps, partition and integration are the laws of nature that we can only delay, but not avoid.

What does this mean to us at the policymaking level? Firstly, the realisation that geography is in a flux. Hence, policymakers must be prepared to think and plan beyond boundaries and stereotypes.

Given the colonial past of the Indo-Pak region, the geography of the two countries has been poorly crafted, which is why we observe over hundreds of separatist movements across the region, hindering development. If we don’t fix this in time, nature will act itself and bring equilibrium, however, not without violence.

The realisation, in the context of development and growth, also provides an opportunity to enhance the people’s welfare. Just by having a liberal visa regime with India can boost tourism multiple folds, injecting billions of dollars in Pakistan. Providing India a trade route to Central Asia can radically transform our highways, transport, communication and services industry, reducing our foreign debt and dependence on remittances.

Secondly, given that the region will eventually undergo geographical shift, the entire development methodology and vision has to be formulated accordingly in the context of regional connectivity. We have to forecast the next 50 years and plan out our infrastructure, cities and social sectors accordingly. Our nation must be prepared for the future.

Lastly, for us in Third World countries, we don’t have to reinvent the wheel. We can just observe the trend in more advanced Western societies, and predict our next 50 years. For instance, the world today is undergoing integration, be it Europe, Asia Pacific or North America. How long will it take for South Asia to undergo the same development?

When the time comes, there will be winners and losers. But in such a shift, the people will eventually always win. The institutions will see a slash in their power. In pursuit of nationhood, the governments and institutions often forget that it’s not the country that is important; it’s the people who live in that country which matter more and must be served. Only when the love for people surpasses the love for country, we might see a prosperous nation that is prepared to accept change and global shifts.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 16th, 2014.
__________________
"Nay! man is evidence against himself. Though he puts forth his excuses." Holy Qur'an (75:14-15)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G.K objectives for all terminator Topics and Notes 18 Friday, January 21, 2022 01:35 AM
Commonwealth games 2010 imran bakht Current Affairs 0 Monday, October 11, 2010 02:42 AM
American Literature Ahmad Bilal English Literature 0 Friday, April 14, 2006 05:58 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.