Monday, April 29, 2024
10:04 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Off Topic Section > General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests

General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests A zone where General Knowledge related to this exam can be shared.Surveys and Threads with polls and questions that require answers can be Posted here

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, May 10, 2009
moonsalpha's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 103
Thanks: 38
Thanked 72 Times in 39 Posts
moonsalpha is on a distinguished road
Post I Believe I Did What Einstein Couldn't Do and Unified Physics

I Believe I Did What Einstein Couldn't Do and Unified Physics

I will share my ideas about the unified field theory which Einstein couldn't do.
Einstein tried to come up with the unified field theory until the day he died. But I think I may have done it if I understand how gravity works.

Gravity was the one force that gave Einstein some problem unifying with all the other forces. With the universe expanding faster than expected due in part to possible dark energy and dark matter, understanding the forces is important.

Gravity is theoretically a very weak force and at the same time a strong force since objects are held to bodies by gravity and don't fly off into space due to centrifugal force. All objects have mass if they exert gravity on other objects. I visualize gravity in the same way I visualize the atom. Objects attracted to a body in space are like the electrons that are bonded to the nucleus of the atom. You could call it a macro-atomic interaction.

The denser an object is, the greater the mass and gravitational attraction. When an aluminum ball that is the same size as a lead ball is dropped, by observation they drop at the same speed. But due to the energy mass of the heavier object since it has more energy in the form of matter, the lead ball should fall faster than the aluminum one.

There will be air resistance that will slow the lighter ball, though it's not readily observed. The air molecules will be attracted to the falling objects due to micro-gravity unless the polarity of both the ball and air are the same. Then there will be repulsion which may accelerate the falling object. Since lead has more electrons than aluminum, the electron voltage will be greater than that of aluminum.

I can see why people would accept string theory. It would explain why bodies in space would be attracted to one another. But with dark energy and dark matter, there should be energy interaction that would take care of gravity between distant bodies. Gravity waves might also explain gravitational attraction.

Gravity would be a unifying force for all the forces since it has similarities to the other forces. The more energy mass and mass containing potential energy the greater the gravitational atraction. The larger the body that is exerting the most gravity, the more energy mass and mass with potential energy it has.

To repel against gravity, it is best to create a repulsive field of the same polarity as the energy exerting gravitational pull by the primary object that exerts gravity. Sometimes a repulsion field tunnel that repels the electromagnetic fields of the earth could allow an object with an electromagnetic field surrounding it to repel against the energy. This may in the future prove to be the least expensive way to go out into space; even less than with rockets and my Ground/Ship Launch/Propulsion System which also uses electromagnetic energy to send powered projectiles out into space.

By unifying the forces, we can better understand how to manipulate them and use them to help us progress. Once hyperlight physics becomes a reality, the rules we are use to may be changed drastically.
__________________
-Better an ounce of luck than a pound of gold.
--Yiddish Proverb
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to moonsalpha For This Useful Post:
saim n babar (Tuesday, July 06, 2010)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Evolution of physics Princess Royal General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Thursday, July 02, 2009 10:04 AM
Western Scientists Zain.ul.Abidin General Science & Ability 3 Friday, October 05, 2007 07:43 PM
4 Things Einstein got wrong Sohail Shuja General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:51 PM
Albert Einstein ahsanghalib General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Saturday, December 16, 2006 06:58 PM
Problem Of The Big Bang Theory Sureshlasi General Science & Ability 1 Friday, December 08, 2006 04:20 AM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.