SIT IN has its own impacts no doubt protest will make pressure on governmental machinery .If we arrange protest then it will prove fruitful for us

WHY does fpsc not fulfill it's criteria in CSS on the pretend of RATIO CRITERION ????
WHY does FPSC pass limited number of candidates in written exam ????

[QUOTE=NADEEMSHEIKH;904287]NTS has different issues whereas FPSC has different
NTS takes huge money for tests but it declares result promptly with marks whereas FPSC receives limited money but result becomes ambiguous[/QUOTE]

70,000 inland revenue inspector candidates
40,000 preventive officer candidates
60,000 appraising/valuation candidates
70,000 inspector custom candidates

That makes 240,000 candidates and since all were BS-16 Rs300 per candidate makes Rs7.2 crores

And i have not even mentioned the other posts during this period and the funding it receives from the government.

So please don't says these lame excuses that fpsc doesn't receive money....it receives ample amount of money it's just the lack of commitment and corruption...that marks of all the candidates are not declared...

FPSC fans would just say it's the policy :waiting

indeed one of the most incompetent and highly corrupt institiuions of our beloved country

Then let's take a unanimous step to correct the flaws of one of the supreme institution of our beloved country . Solutions are important .

our recommendations will not be entertained by apex authorities because they don't want to revamp their policies an strategies

FPSC collects huge amount from unemployed candidates neither they feel ignominy nor change their maneuver

Anyways we must file a petition to ensure our rights. FPSC must disclose the marks of candidates in general recruitment . I am ready to file a petition and I will bear all expenses etc . But I need few potential candidates to support me in proceedings. Choice is all yours . I am fed up of their so-called meritocracy. BULLSHIT it is except CSS where merit is ensured. If interested make a thread where we may discuss to bring some change . This would be my headache to bring them to the court and deal with these veiled guys in their very own style . Please raise voice elsewise you may regret that you had a chance and you could have made it possible . Regards and apologies if I violated the rules of forum .

There is no transparency
 

I have another example of their so called transparency:

One candidate updated pictures of question paper of FIA Inspector on ppscforum.com and I sent an email to fpsc that when it is not allowed to take the paper out from centre than how she took the paper out. They replied me after multiple reminders that they have black listed her and after two days fpsc announced the result of Preventive Officer and she was shortlisted for phase 2..

They are just making us fool by answering our emails. Nothing else.

Share your emails and contact numbers if you guys are interested in preventing this evil